Bajaj Avenger Street 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Price starts at Rs. 1.48 Lakh which is Rs. 30,054 costlier than base model of Bajaj Avenger Street 160 priced at Rs. 1.18 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is 50.77 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is 37 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is powered by 160 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is available in 2 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Avenger Street 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Avenger Street 160 vs Apache RTR 200 4V

Key Highlights Avenger Street 160 STDApache RTR 200 4V Dual Channel ABS
Engine Type Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Max Power 15 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm

Avenger Street 160 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Avenger Street 160 STDTVS Apache RTR 200 4V Dual Channel ABS
Rating
230 reviews
314 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.18 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.48 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Max Power 15 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,544 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 4,282 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,684 Avenger Street 160 Insurance Rs. 11,189 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled
Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Engine Displacement
160 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
15 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque
13.7 Nm @ 7000 rpm
17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
58 mm
66 mm
Stroke
60.7 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
...
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
16 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
29.46 mm
Mileage (City)
47.2 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
50.77 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
47.2 kmpl
37 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
12.23s
Top Speed
...
127 kmph

Tyre Size
...
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Peak Power
15 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
737 mm
800 mm
Length*Width*Height
2210*806*1070 mm3
2020*790*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1490 mm
1353 mm
Length
2210 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
169 mm
180 mm
Height
1070 mm
1050 mm
Width
806 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
156 Kg
152 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
737 mm
800 mm
Front Brake Diameter
280 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
130 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
...
(Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 105 kmph), (Maximum Torque Urban/Rain Mode - 16.51 Nm @ 5750 rpm), (Maximum Power Urban/Rain Mode - 17.3 PS @ 7800 rpm), Oil cooled with ram air Assist, TVS SmartXonnect, Glide Through Technology, Muffler - Twin pipe and twin barrel Design, Max Speed Adjustable Levers, Race Tuned Fuel Injection, Race Tuned Slipper Clutch, Racing Double Barrel Exhaust, Control Switch, Race Telemetry, Lean Angle Mode, Crash Alert, Idle Speed - 1550 ± 200 rpm, Air Cleaner Type - Viscous Paper Filter, Brake Fluid - DOT 3/DOT 4
Call/SMS Alerts
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 4AH
12V / 8AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Diamond
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Street Bikes, Cruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Handle Type
Street Control
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Passenger Backrest
...
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
DRLs

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Avenger Street 160
  • Has classic cruiser styling with the low seating position
  • forward-set footpegs and easy-to-reach handlebars; Most affordable cruiser in the Indian two-wheeler market and a great city bike
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Aggressive styling which makes it stand out
  • Offers a lot of modern features
  • Adjustable suspension makes it quite versatile
Bajaj Avenger Street 160
  • It should’ve gotten dual-channel ABS; There is room for improvement in the mileage output; The build quality is not the best
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Lacks a 6th gear which takes away from its touring potential
  • Slightly cramped ergonomics for taller riders
  • Design feels a bit too similar to the Apache RTR 160 4V

Is Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?

64% users have chosen Bajaj Avenger Street 160 over TVS Apache RTR 200 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2610 users have also rated Bajaj Avenger Street 160 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of performance and features. On the basis of mileage and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Avenger Street 160 Apache RTR 200 4V
Mileage 3.8 3.8
Performance 4.0 4.4
Comfort 4.4 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 3.8
Features 4.1 4.5
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike to choose, RTR 200 4V or Pulsar F250?
  • Apache
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V has been one of the nicest 200cc motorcycles in India, and the 2021 iteration elevates its potential to another level. It is sharp and agile, while maintaining friendly power delivery. It gets features like adjustable front suspension and hand levers, which are unheard of on bikes in the same segment or even a step higher. However, the lack of a sixth gear limits its touring potential. On the other hand, the F250 comes across as the more complete package as its price, looks, ergonomics, and performance mark it out as the successor to the 220F. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -[2021 Bajaj Pulsar F250
Q. Which is the better option for city ride and sometimes 100 km tour in long-distance bajaj avenger 160 or Yamaha fzx?
  • The lazy rake angle and the ridiculously long wheelbase of 1480mm might lead you to believe that the Avenger would have a very vague feeling front end and wouldn’t be a nimble handler. But that really isn’t the case. While it wouldn’t be our first choice for some corner-carving action, the front does feel stable enough through the bends. And it turns rather quickly too. But this agility is a bigger boon in the city, where darting through traffic feels easy enough - a good thing as the Avenger 160 is really more of an urban cruiser than an out-and-out highway tourer. On the other hand, if we talk about FZ-X, compared to the regular FZ-FI, the FZ-X’s handlebars are taller and pulled closer to the rider, and the footpegs have been moved quite a bit forwards. So you end up sitting in a very commuters stance. Combine that with the very soft seat and you’re bound to have a back and butt ache if you spend a long time in the saddle. Then there’s the highway performance. You’ll only be able to maintain speeds of about 80-85kmph comfortably on the highway. Anything faster than that makes the bike feel rather strained. And because of this, highway efficiency, while fairly ok at 48.67kmpl, takes a bit of a hit compared to city efficiency. For a better understanding of performance and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership..Read more:- Yamaha FZ-X: Road Test ReviewRead more:- 2019 Bajaj Avenger Street 160 ABS: Road Test Review
Q. Is Avenger 220 Street worth the purchase for touring as there would be a pillion with me or Avenger 180 or 160 would be a better choice to go with? Planning to purchase in 2022.
  • Yes
  • As per your requirements, Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 could prove to be a good option. The seat is cushioned well and wide enough for the comfort of the rider. However, the same can out be said about the pillion seat. What's more, the Cruise 220’s handlebars are relatively taller and narrower making it slightly difficult to guide around tight bends. Furthermore, the Bajaj Avenger 180 is no longer available for sale in the market. As for the Avenger Street 160, it offers a smooth engine, comfortable ride quality and reassuring braking prowess. The Avenger Street 160 simply proves that there indeed can be a replacement for displacement. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you to take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.

Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Avenger Street 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is better on the grounds of performance and features. On the basis of mileage and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Avenger Street 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
The Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is cheaper than TVS Apache RTR 200 4V by Rs. 30,054.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Avenger Street 160 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
For the STD version, 160 cc Petrol engine of Avenger Street 160 produces 15 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 13.7 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Dual Channel ABS version, 197.75 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 200 4V produces 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Avenger Street 160 has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and Bajaj Avenger Street 160

×
Select Category