Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Price starts at Rs. 1.84 Lakh which is Rs. 34,215 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 is available in 3 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar RS200 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Pulsar RS200 STDHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, Single Spark 4-Valve, FI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Pulsar RS200 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar RS200 STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
Be the first to review this bike
758 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.84 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, Single Spark 4-Valve, FI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 5,503 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,247 Pulsar RS200 Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, Single Spark 4-Valve, FI Engine
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
349.34 cc
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
75 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.43s
Top Speed
...
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
810 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
1999*765*1114 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
1358 mm
1370 mm
Length
1999 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
157 mm
150 mm
Height
1114 mm
1055 mm
Width
765 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
167 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
810 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
153 mm

Additional Features
Gear Indication, Integrated Ambient Light Sensor
...
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
...
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar RS200
  • Riding posture is comfortable
  • Engine loves to be revved high
  • Twin projector headlight provides good illumination
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Bajaj Pulsar RS200
  • 10-year old styling
  • Fit and finish not up to the mark
  • Still does not get an USD fork
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar RS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Community

Bajaj Pulsar RS200 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar RS200 by Rs. 34,215.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar RS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar RS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar RS200

Which one do you like more?
Pulsar RS200
Pulsar RS200
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Select Category
✖
✖