Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 21,978 costlier than base model of Hop Oxo priced at Rs. 1.27 Lakh. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Hop Oxo is available in 5 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Hop Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Oxo vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Oxo STDHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Top Speed 88 km/Hr 114 kmph
Range 140 km/charge ...
Charging Time 5 Hr ...

Oxo vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Hop Electric Oxo STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
27 reviews
758 reviews
Brand Name Hop Electric Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.27 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Hop Electric Oxo Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Range 140 km/charge ...
Charging Time 5 Hr ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
Running Cost Rs. 0.16/km Rs. 2.76/km
EMI ...
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,556 Oxo Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Torque (wheel)
175 Nm
...
Engine Type
...
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
...
349.34 cc
No. Of Batteries
...
Max Power
...
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
...
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
75 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
Motor IP Rating
IP67
...
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Battery Warranty
3 Years or 50,000 Km
...
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Motor Warranty
3 Years
...
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.43s
Top Speed
88 km/Hr
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-18 Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
...
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
780 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
250 kg
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
2100*793*1065 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1370 mm
Length
2100 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
180 mm
150 mm
Height
1065 mm
1055 mm
Width
793 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
143 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
780 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
240 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Additional Features
Riding Modes - Eco | Power | Sport, Controller - Sinusoidal FOC Vector Control, Off board charger
...
Claimed range
140 km/charge
...
Regenerative braking
...
USB charging port
Range
140 km/charge
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Charging at Home
...
Range (Eco Mode)
140 km/charge
...
Battery Capacity
3.37 Kwh
...
Range (Normal Mode)
90 km/charge
...
Charging Time
5 Hr
...
Charging Time(0-80%)
4.15 Hrs
...
Range (Sport Mode)
65 km/charge
...
Charging Time(0-100%)
5 Hrs
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
...
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
5 inch Smart LCD Display with IP67 rating
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
...
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
15 Degree
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
...
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Charger Output
850 W
...
Cooling System
...
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
50000
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Hop Electric Oxo Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Hop Oxo is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance. On the basis of comfort and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Hop Oxo is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 21,978.
Which bike offers better performance Hop Electric Oxo vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences the Hop Oxo has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Hop Oxo

×
Select Category