Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 Price starts at Rs. 2.19 Lakh which is Rs. 69,690 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is 31 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is powered by 249.07 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is available in 1 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Vitpilen 250 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Vitpilen 250 Gen 2Hunter 350 Retro
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, SOHC Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 31 PS @ 9500 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm

Vitpilen 250 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 Gen 2Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
56 reviews
760 reviews
Brand Name Husqvarna Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.19 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, SOHC Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 31 PS @ 9500 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 6,012 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,383 Vitpilen 250 Insurance Rs. 11,211 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, SOHC
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
249.07 cc
349.34 cc
Max Power
31 PS @ 9500 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
25 Nm @ 7500 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
75 mm
Stroke
61.1 mm
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (Overall)
31 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.43s
Top Speed
150 kmph
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
31 PS @ 9500 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
820 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
...
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
1368 mm
1370 mm
Length
...
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
177 mm
150 mm
Height
...
1055 mm
Width
...
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
13.5 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
163.8 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
820 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
153 mm

Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Music control
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
New Steel-trellis fram and subframx
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cafe Racer Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
5 LCD display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
...
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.

Is Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

69% users have chosen Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1318 users have also rated Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, maintenance and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Vitpilen 250
Mileage 3.9 3.9
Performance 4.8 4.4
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Features 4.7 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, maintenance and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort. On the basis of mileage user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 by Rs. 69,690.
Which bike offers better performance Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the Gen 2 version, 249.07 cc Petrol engine of Vitpilen 250 produces 31 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 25 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Husqvarna Vitpilen 250 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Husqvarna Vitpilen 250

×
Select Category