KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300

QJ Motor SRV 300 Price starts at Rs. 3.19 Lakh which is Rs. 1.01 Lakh costlier than base model of KTM RC 200 priced at Rs. 2.17 Lakh. The claimed mileage of KTM RC 200 is 35 kmpl whereas the mileage of QJ Motor SRV 300 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while QJ Motor SRV 300 is powered by 296 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 3 different colours while QJ Motor SRV 300 comes with 1 colours. The Comparison KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

RC 200 vs SRV 300

Key Highlights RC 200 GP EditionSRV 300 Orange
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine V-Twin liquid-cooled engine, SOHC, 4 Stroke 8 valves
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 30.72 PS @ 9000 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300

RC 200 vs SRV 300 Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM RC 200 GP EditionQJ Motor SRV 300 Orange
Rating
136 reviews
7 reviews
Brand Name KTM QJ Motor
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.17 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 3.19 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine V-Twin liquid-cooled engine, SOHC, 4 Stroke 8 valves
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 30.72 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM RC 200 Colors
QJ Motor SRV 300 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-406.4 mm,Rear :-381 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Push Button Start
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,960 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 8,734 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,351 RC 200 Insurance Rs. 14,054 SRV 300 Insurance
Brochure N/A N/A

Engine Type
Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
V-Twin liquid-cooled engine, SOHC, 4 Stroke 8 valves
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
296 cc
Max Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
30.72 PS @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque
19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm
26 Nm @ 5000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
58 mm
Stroke
49 mm
56 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Electric
Compression Ratio
13.3:1
11.8:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (City)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
35 kmpl
35 kmpl
Top Speed
140 kmph
135 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Front :-120/80-16 Rear :-150/80-15
Peak Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
30.72 PS @ 9000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-406.4 mm,Rear :-381 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Dry Weight
151 kg
...
Seat height
835 mm
700 mm
Length*Width*Height
...
2110*850*1100 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1400 mm
Length
...
2110 mm
Ground Clearance
156 mm
160 mm
Height
...
1100 mm
Width
...
850 mm
Fuel Capacity
13.7 Liters
13.5 Liters
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
164 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
835 mm
700 mm
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
280 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
...
Additional Features
Lubrication - Forced, Wet sump, Rider Aids - Supermoto ABS, Gear Position, Fuel Consumption
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Frame
Split-Trellis frame (Tubular), Sub Frame - Newly engineered bolt-on subframe
Bassinet type
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Push Button Start
Seat Type
Split
...
Pass Switch
...
Display
New LCD Dash display
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 200
  • Sharp but forgiving handling; Meatier torque band aids overall driveability; More accessible ergonomics makes for a better all-rounder
KTM RC 200
  • Tyres lack edge grip
  • letting down the otherwise great handling package; It is a bit pricey; The edgy design is quite polarising
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of KTM RC 200 and QJ Motor SRV 300

Latest News on KTM RC 200 and QJ Motor SRV 300

KTM RC 200 Vs QJ Motor SRV 300 FAQs

Which bike is best between KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300?
QJ Motor SRV 300 has out rated KTM RC 200 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300?
The KTM RC 200 is cheaper than QJ Motor SRV 300 by Rs. 1.01 Lakh.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 200 vs QJ Motor SRV 300?
For the GP Edition version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of RC 200 produces 25 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Orange version, 296 cc Petrol engine of SRV 300 produces 30.72 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 26 Nm @ 5000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the KTM RC 200 has better performance.

Images of KTM RC 200 and QJ Motor SRV 300

Which one do you like more?
SRV 300
SRV 300
RC 200
RC 200
×
Select Category
✖
✖