KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 2.17 Lakh which is Rs. 71,795 costlier than base model of Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 priced at Rs. 1.45 Lakh. The claimed mileage of KTM RC 200 is 35 kmpl whereas the mileage of Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is 45 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is powered by 155 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 3 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 comes with 4 colours. The Comparison KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

RC 200 vs Gixxer SF 150

Key Highlights RC 200 GP EditionGixxer SF 150 STD
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

RC 200 vs Gixxer SF 150 Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM RC 200 GP EditionSuzuki Gixxer SF 150 STD
Rating
136 reviews
272 reviews
Brand Name KTM Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.17 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.45 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM RC 200 Colors
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,960 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 4,203 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,351 RC 200 Insurance Rs. 12,712 Gixxer SF 150 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
155 cc
Max Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm
13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
56 mm
Stroke
49 mm
62.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
...
Compression Ratio
13.3:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (City)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
35 kmpl
45 kmpl
Top Speed
140 kmph
130 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Front :-100/80-17,Rear :-140/60-17
Peak Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Dry Weight
151 kg
...
Seat height
835 mm
795 mm
Length*Width*Height
...
2025*715*1035 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1340 mm
Length
...
2025 mm
Ground Clearance
156 mm
165 mm
Height
...
1035 mm
Width
...
715 mm
Fuel Capacity
13.7 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
148 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
835 mm
795 mm
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
...
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
...

Battery Type
Lead Acid
...
Additional Features
Lubrication - Forced, Wet sump, Rider Aids - Supermoto ABS, Gear Position, Fuel Consumption
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 3AH
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Frame
Split-Trellis frame (Tubular), Sub Frame - Newly engineered bolt-on subframe
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
New LCD Dash display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 200
  • Sharp but forgiving handling; Meatier torque band aids overall driveability; More accessible ergonomics makes for a better all-rounder
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150
  • Sporty styling
  • fantastic fit and finish levels
  • Great handling dynamics
KTM RC 200
  • Tyres lack edge grip
  • letting down the otherwise great handling package; It is a bit pricey; The edgy design is quite polarising
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150
  • Expensive!
  • brakes lack bite and feedback
  • BS6 update has dropped performance

Is KTM RC 200 Better Than Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?

66% users have chosen KTM RC 200 over Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1185 users have also rated KTM RC 200 and Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences KTM RC 200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance in your bike. But Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance. On the basis of comfort and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor RC 200 Gixxer SF 150
Mileage 3.9 4.3
Performance 4.5 4.3
Comfort 4.2 4.2
Maintenance 3.7 4.0
Features 4.5 4.5
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on KTM RC 200 and Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Compare with Suzuki sf 155cc and Xtreme 160S which one is better..and mileage,maitainance,price ,Road grip, etccc
  • Suzuki Gixxer sf is best on-off road as well economical best engine performance smoothly running on road looks are good
  • Your comparison is wrong. because xtreme is a naked bike and gixxersf is a sports bike. you will get more Road grip in gixxersf and milage in extreme.you have to choose as per your wish.and once you check in zigwheels.
  • It would be too early to give a verdict as Hero Xtreme 160s is not launched yet, we would suggest you to stay tuned for the updates. On the other hand, With its premium quality and fit and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by a 155 cc engine. This Gixxer SF engine generates a power of 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm and a torque of 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is best hornet 2.0 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150. I need a well refined engine and a very good sports tourer.
  • Gixxer sf is better than hornet 2.0
  • Selecting between the Honda Hornet 2.0 and Suzuki Gixxer SF would depend on your preference of the segment, budget, preference of power output, features required, etc. The Honda Hornet 2.0 could be a good option if you are looking for a bike with light handling, comfortable ride quality, and seating. On the upside, when you cruise at an economical speed, the motor gingerly sips from the 12-litre fuel tank to return 55.11kmpl. It gets even better in the city, with a very respectable mileage figure of 57.35kmpl. The Hornet offers a sensible and easy motorcycling experience. But, for that premium price, it should feel premium, and it doesn’t do that enough. Neither in terms of build quality nor features. On the other hand, With its premium quality and fit, and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. It offers decent power performance, good ride quality, and Great handling dynamics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Suzuki Gixxer SF or Hornet 2.0, which bike is more comfortable for pillion?
  • Hornet is more comfortable
  • As per your requirement, we would suggest you go for Honda Hornet 2.0. With a frugal engine, agreeable ergos, light handling and a comfortable ride, the Hornet makes for a great city bike. On the upside, when you cruise at an economical speed, the motor gingerly sips from the 12-litre fuel tank to return 55.11kmpl. It gets even better in the city, with a very respectable mileage figure of 57.35kmpl. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|KTM RC 200 Community

KTM RC 200 Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 FAQs

Which bike is best between KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
As per the users experiences KTM RC 200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance in your bike. But Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance. On the basis of comfort and features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is cheaper than KTM RC 200 by Rs. 71,795.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
For the GP Edition version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of RC 200 produces 25 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF 150 produces 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the KTM RC 200 has better performance.

Images of Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and KTM RC 200

Which one do you like more?
RC 200
RC 200
Gixxer SF 150
Gixxer SF 150
×
Select Category
✖
✖