Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST

TVS iQube ST Price starts at Rs. 1.55 Lakh which is Rs. 5,655 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS iQube ST comes with 4 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs iQube ST

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroiQube ST 3.4 kWh
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine ...
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 4.4 kW
Top Speed 114 kmph 82 km/Hr
Range ... 100 km/charge
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST

Hunter 350 vs iQube ST Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS iQube ST 3.4 kWh
Rating
752 reviews
5 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.55 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine ...
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 4.4 kW
Fuel Type Petrol Electric
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS iQube ST Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Range ... 100 km/charge
ABS Single Channel ...
Starting Self Start Only Push Button Start
Speedometer Analogue Digital
Running Cost Rs. 2.76/km Rs. 0.22/km
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
...
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 6,180 iQube ST Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Torque (wheel)
...
33 Nm
Torque (motor)
...
140 Nm
Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
...
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
...
No. Of Batteries
...
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
4.4 kW
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
...
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
...
Bore
75 mm
...
Stroke
85.8 mm
...
Motor IP Rating
...
IP67
No Of Cylinders
1
...
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Hub Motor
Valve Per Cylinder
2
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Electric
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
...
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
82 km/Hr

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-12 Rear :-90/90-12
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
4.4 kW
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-304.8 mm,Rear :-304.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
770 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
1805*645*1140 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1301 mm
Length
2055 mm
1805 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
157 mm
Height
1055 mm
1140 mm
Width
800 mm
645 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
...
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
129.7 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
770 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
220 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
...
Li-ion
Motor Type
...
BLDC
Additional Features
...
Live Location Status, Crash and Fall Alert, GSM Connectivity, Off Boad Charger, HMI Joystick, Document Storage, Social Media Notifications, User Profile, Custom Themes, Wallpaper Selection
Claimed range
...
100 km/charge
Charging network / Battery swapping network
...
Call/SMS Alerts
...
Regenerative braking
...
USB charging port
Music control
...
OTA
...
Range
...
100 km/charge
Fast Charging
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Charging at Home
...
Range (Eco Mode)
...
100 km/charge
Battery Capacity
...
3.4 Kwh
Charging at Charging Station
...
Charging Time(0-80%)
...
3 Hr
Range (Sport Mode)
...
75 km/charge
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Tubular Structure
ABS
Single Channel
...
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Electric Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Internet Connectivity
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Push Button Start
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
7 Inch TFT
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
...
10°
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Carry hook
...
Underseat storage
...
32 L
Geo Fencing
...
Charger Output
...
950 W
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
...
Anti Theft Alarm
...
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS iQube ST

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS iQube ST FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort, maintenance and features in your bike. But TVS iQube ST is better on the grounds of mileage.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than TVS iQube ST by Rs. 5,655.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS iQube ST?
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS iQube ST

Which one do you like more?
iQube ST
iQube ST
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Select Category
✖
✖