Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 90,020 costlier than base model of TVS Radeon priced at Rs. 59,880. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Radeon is 68.6 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while TVS Radeon is powered by 109.7 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS Radeon comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Radeon

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroRadeon Base Edition
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine 4 Stroke Duralife Engine
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 8.19 PS @ 7350 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon

Hunter 350 vs Radeon Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS Radeon Base Edition
Rating
752 reviews
248 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 59,880 Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine 4 Stroke Duralife Engine
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 8.19 PS @ 7350 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Radeon Colors
Brakes Front Disc Drum
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Braking Type ... Synchronized Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-457.2 mm, Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel ...
Starting Self Start Only Kick and Self Start
Speedometer Analogue Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 1,725 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 5,819 Radeon Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
4 Stroke Duralife Engine
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
109.7 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
8.19 PS @ 7350 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
8.7 Nm @ 4500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
53.5 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
48.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
ECU
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Drum
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum
Braking Type
...
Synchronized Braking System

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (City)
...
73.68 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
68.6 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
73.68 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
...

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-2.75-18, Rear :- 3.00-18
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
8.19 PS @ 7350 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-457.2 mm, Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
...
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2025*705*1080 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1265 mm
Length
2055 mm
2025 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
180 mm
Height
1055 mm
1080 mm
Width
800 mm
705 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
113 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Saddle Height
790 mm
...
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
130 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
110 mm

USB charging port
Headlight
Halogen
Halogen
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 4AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
Bulb

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Single Cradle Tubular Frame
ABS
Single Channel
...
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Commuter Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Analogue
Starting
Self Start Only
Kick and Self Start
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
...
Speedometer
Analogue
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Analogue
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Carry hook
...
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Analogue
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
TVS Radeon
  • One of the most fuel-efficient bikes we have tested. Higher-end variants are feature-packed. Supple suspension setup
  • Soft well-padded seat offers a comfortable ride.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
TVS Radeon
  • Splendor-like looks may not be for everyone
  • The narrow tyres may feel a bit unsettling at higher speeds
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Radeon Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Radeon

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Radeon FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But TVS Radeon is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon?
The TVS Radeon is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 90,020.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Radeon?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Base Edition version, 109.7 cc Petrol engine of Radeon produces 8.19 PS @ 7350 rpm of power and 8.7 Nm @ 4500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Radeon

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
Radeon
Radeon
×
Select Category
✖
✖