Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 14,900 costlier than base model of TVS Ronin priced at Rs. 1.35 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Ronin is 40.77 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while TVS Ronin is powered by 225.9 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS Ronin comes with 10 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Ronin

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroRonin SS - Lighting Black
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, 4 Valve, SOHC
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin

Hunter 350 vs Ronin Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS Ronin SS - Lighting Black
Rating
753 reviews
195 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.35 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, 4 Valve, SOHC
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Ronin Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Spoke Alloy Wheels
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,889 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,960 Ronin Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, 4 Valve, SOHC
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
225.9 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
19.93 Nm @ 3750 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
66 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
66 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
17.29 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
34.05 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
56.28 mm
Mileage (City)
...
42.95 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
40.77 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
42.95 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
14.59s
Top Speed
114 kmph
120 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-130/70-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Spoke Alloy Wheels
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
795 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2040*805*1170 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1357 mm
Length
2055 mm
2040 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
181 mm
Height
1055 mm
1170 mm
Width
800 mm
805 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
14 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
159 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
795 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
...
ABS Modes - Rain & Urban Mode, Upside-Down Front Fork, Gear Shift Assist, Lever Type - Normal Levers, Integrated Starter Generator, Distance To Empty, Side-Stand Engine Inhibitor, Hazard Lamp, Two Trip Meter, Glide Through Technology, Chain Cover, Position Lamp, Side-Stand Indication
USB charging port
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Cruiser Bikes, Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
TVS Ronin
  • Torquey engine ensures you don’t have to shift as frequently
  • Excellent fit and finish
  • Lightweight and agile in both city traffic and highway
  • Can easily accommodate tall riders.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
TVS Ronin
  • Unimpressive highway performance
  • You’ll need to pull the front brake lever really hard for aggressive braking

Is TVS Ronin Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

59% users have chosen TVS Ronin over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1467 users have also rated TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences TVS Ronin is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Ronin Hunter 350
Mileage 4.0 3.9
Performance 4.2 4.4
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 3.9 3.8
Features 4.5 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Ronin Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is best TVS Ronin or Yamaha FZ S?
  • My experience yamaha fzs fi v3 very good
  • Both bike are good but according to my experience FZ s bike is so good
  • Yamaha FZ s
View All Answers
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Ronin FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But TVS Ronin is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
The TVS Ronin is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 14,900.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the SS - Lighting Black version, 225.9 cc Petrol engine of Ronin produces 20.4 PS @ 7750 rpm of power and 19.93 Nm @ 3750 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Ronin

Which one do you like more?
Ronin
Ronin
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Select Category
✖
✖