Kshitij Kshitij
| 4 years ago
@ Dillip | All these bikes are good enough and easy for pocket to maintain.
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant
iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly as ever despite the slight drop in power and torque
figures. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a truly value for money motorcycle in its segment.
In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While
its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around
Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with other options. if you are looking for better power performance,
build quality, good features and a more stable bike, you may go for Hornet 2.0. It is comfortable enough and
gets a refined and smooth engine too. If we talk about Honda Unicorn, it has always been the go-to bike if you
were planning to buy a 150cc commuter. The BS6 update has given the bike a larger motor, while retaining the
dynamics of the older bike. It still remains a well-rounded motorcycle, but the BS6 update has come with a
hefty price hike.You may compare all these bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity.
Check out authorised dealership details.
...Read More
I have a similar requirement as yours (in the question), and have test-ridden hero Xtreme 160R, as well; along with the options mentioned above, this is what I noted. With the reviews and verdicts from almost every major auto channel, it was an obvious run. To my surprise, I couldn't find the 'sporty' (rear set foot-pegs) on the Apache RTR 160 4v as comfortable as other bikes - however, TVS's offering was the best in the segment, before the BS6 norms pushed in, due to lower kerb weight and the power figures. The ride quality and handling are superb, plus a decent fuel economy is a pro.Given that I found the ride a bit too tiring for my wrists, and a Honda showroom was next in line, I drove the Hornet 2.0. You hop on to its saddle, and you feel a certain correction in the posture - an upright, wide handlebar setting, with mildly rear-set footpegs, make you stay easy, even at higher speeds - the suspension setup is on the firm side though - the higher cost and the lower fuel economy are the only cons that I could measure at the moment.Next, Hero extreme 160R was a similar offering, just with a refined but slightly weaker engine than the Hornet 2.0 - you miss the pull from the engine to go up and rev it higher - the bike is nimble and a very capable handler of bad roads too. Fuel economy is quite similar to TVS's just the braking improves with the lower weight figures.For the final option, I went in to drive the FZ-S V3 - It was a DELIGHT - you sit even more so relaxed than on any of the previous bikes, and the ride quality is plush! Given that I was riding it right after the previous two, the motor felt far too refined for even the Hornet to match. Better economy and festive deals made it a better choice for me - given the quality, comfort being better than what I had tested and the cost was considerably lower than the other options.The only question that I have in mind is 'How long is the FZ going to continue in India?'; given that spare parts vanish out of Indian markets, as soon as the bike is discontinued.In my opinion, if you prefer an easy-riding style and economy and comfort are a priority, go with Yamaha's 'Lord of The Streets'. Hornet 2.0 also makes a better option if the budget allows, too.
...Read More
12
Reply
Newbie
