Which is better RTR 1604v or Pulsar 180F?

Q. Which is better RTR 1604v or Pulsar 180F?
383 Views Follow Question Add Answer

24 Answers

Althaf | 5 years ago

180f is better but when you ride long sound becomes weird....some people won't like that...

2 Reply

Balu | 4 years ago

Wait for few months in upcoming bs6 engines it is mandatory to have fuel injection

1 Reply

Hunk | 5 years ago

Pulsar180f is better reason is you have good look and more mileage and performance for this bike and it's give the painless ride on long trips

1 Reply

Suraj | 4 years ago

Pulsar 180, if compared to RTR160

0 Reply

Mani | 4 years ago

180F

1 Reply

Ishant | 4 years ago

180

0 Reply

Ajay | 4 years ago

180

0 Reply

Pcr | 4 years ago

No doubt 180f

0 Reply

Asmit Sharma | 5 years ago

It's depend upon your riding style. I get approx 48kmpl mileage from my Apache 160 4V

0 Reply

Ashwin | 5 years ago

Both are more over the same... Both will give u around 45 if u drive it sensibly..

0 Reply

Tushar | 5 years ago

I am getting mileage of 42-43 km per liter for my TVS Apache 160 4V.

0 Reply

Pravin | 5 years ago

I get my apache 160 4v 64kmpl mileage before 1st service

0 Reply

Priyanshu | 5 years ago

Tvs apache 1604v much more fuel efficient and reliable

0 Reply

Rajan | 5 years ago

Pluser 180f better bec price is less

0 Reply

Jogender | 5 years ago

RTR 160 4 V NOT A GOOD BIKE OVERALL

0 Reply

Shun | 5 years ago

How plz tell me ...

0 Reply

Hiren | 5 years ago

Comfort is better

0 Reply

Akash | 5 years ago

Obviously 160 4v

0 Reply

Rajan | 5 years ago

Both bikes

0 Reply

Shubham | 5 years ago

160 4V

0 Reply

Shailesh | 5 years ago

180f

0 Reply

Mrinmoy | 5 years ago

180F

0 Reply

Deepak | 5 years ago

180f

0 Reply

Satta | 5 years ago

180F

3 Reply

Add your Answer

Submit Answer