Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 Price starts at Rs. 1.45 Lakh which is Rs. 51,194 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar N125 priced at Rs. 94,707. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar N125 is powered by 124.58 cc engine , while Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is powered by 155 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar N125 is available in 7 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 comes with 4 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar N125 vs Gixxer SF 150

Key Highlights Pulsar N125 LED DiscGixxer SF 150 STD
Engine Type ... 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Max Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm

Pulsar N125 vs Gixxer SF 150 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar N125 LED DiscSuzuki Gixxer SF 150 STD
Rating
3 reviews
272 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 94,707 Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.45 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type ... 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Max Power 12 PS @ 8500 rpm 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar N125 Colors
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Kick and Self Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 2,831 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 4,203 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 6,561 Pulsar N125 Insurance Rs. 12,712 Gixxer SF 150 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
...
4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Air cooled
Engine Displacement
124.58 cc
155 cc
Max Power
12 PS @ 8500 rpm
13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
11 Nm @ 6000 rpm
13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
54 mm
56 mm
Stroke
54.4 mm
62.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Mileage (Overall)
...
45 kmpl

Tyre Size
Front :-80/100-17 Rear :-100/90-17
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-140/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
795 mm
Length*Width*Height
...
2025*715*1035 mm3
Wheelbase
1295 mm
1340 mm
Length
...
2025 mm
Ground Clearance
198 mm
165 mm
Height
...
1035 mm
Width
...
715 mm
Fuel Capacity
9.5 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
125 Kg
148 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
240 mm
...
Rear Brake Diameter
130 mm
...

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Additional Features
...
Twin Muffler, Aerodynamic Design, Side Stand Interlock
Headlight
LED
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Starting
Kick and Self Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
...
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar N125
  • Refined motor with good grunt
  • Lightweight and compact bike for daily commuting
  • Nimble handling and very plush ride quality over bad roads
  • Unique design; does not share parts with other N-series Pulsar models
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150
  • Sporty styling
  • fantastic fit and finish levels
  • Great handling dynamics
Bajaj Pulsar N125
  • Only gets CBS (Combined Braking System) - No ABS being offered
  • The entry-spec model gets a skinnier rear tyre
Suzuki Gixxer SF 150
  • Expensive!
  • brakes lack bite and feedback
  • BS6 update has dropped performance
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Bajaj Pulsar N125 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N125 and Suzuki Gixxer SF 150

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Compare with Suzuki sf 155cc and Xtreme 160S which one is better..and mileage,maitainance,price ,Road grip, etccc
  • Suzuki Gixxer sf is best on-off road as well economical best engine performance smoothly running on road looks are good
  • Your comparison is wrong. because xtreme is a naked bike and gixxersf is a sports bike. you will get more Road grip in gixxersf and milage in extreme.you have to choose as per your wish.and once you check in zigwheels.
  • It would be too early to give a verdict as Hero Xtreme 160s is not launched yet, we would suggest you to stay tuned for the updates. On the other hand, With its premium quality and fit and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by a 155 cc engine. This Gixxer SF engine generates a power of 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm and a torque of 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is best hornet 2.0 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150. I need a well refined engine and a very good sports tourer.
  • Gixxer sf is better than hornet 2.0
  • Selecting between the Honda Hornet 2.0 and Suzuki Gixxer SF would depend on your preference of the segment, budget, preference of power output, features required, etc. The Honda Hornet 2.0 could be a good option if you are looking for a bike with light handling, comfortable ride quality, and seating. On the upside, when you cruise at an economical speed, the motor gingerly sips from the 12-litre fuel tank to return 55.11kmpl. It gets even better in the city, with a very respectable mileage figure of 57.35kmpl. The Hornet offers a sensible and easy motorcycling experience. But, for that premium price, it should feel premium, and it doesn’t do that enough. Neither in terms of build quality nor features. On the other hand, With its premium quality and fit, and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. It offers decent power performance, good ride quality, and Great handling dynamics. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Suzuki Gixxer SF or Hornet 2.0, which bike is more comfortable for pillion?
  • Hornet is more comfortable
  • As per your requirement, we would suggest you go for Honda Hornet 2.0. With a frugal engine, agreeable ergos, light handling and a comfortable ride, the Hornet makes for a great city bike. On the upside, when you cruise at an economical speed, the motor gingerly sips from the 12-litre fuel tank to return 55.11kmpl. It gets even better in the city, with a very respectable mileage figure of 57.35kmpl. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.

Bajaj Pulsar N125 Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N125 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and features in your bike. But Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 is better on the grounds of comfort and maintenance.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
The Bajaj Pulsar N125 is cheaper than Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 by Rs. 51,194.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar N125 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 150?
For the LED Disc version, 124.58 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar N125 produces 12 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 11 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF 150 produces 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar N125 has better performance.

Images of Suzuki Gixxer SF 150 and Bajaj Pulsar N125

×
Recently Visited
Select Category