Explore all New Cars of 2024
Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350
Key Highlights | Pulsar N160 Dual Channel ABS | Hunter 350 Retro |
---|---|---|
Engine Type | 4 stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 2-valve, air cooled, FI | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
Max Power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
-
Rs. 1.33 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,002 View November OffersRs. 1.49 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,318 View November Offers
Pulsar N160 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights
Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar N160 Dual Channel ABS | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro |
---|---|---|
Rating |
384 reviews
|
747 reviews
|
Brand Name | Bajaj | Royal Enfield |
Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.33 Lakh Get On-Road Price | Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price |
Engine Type | 4 stroke, single cylinder, SOHC, 2-valve, air cooled, FI | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
Max Power | 16 PS @ 8750 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
Colors | ||
Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
Brakes Rear | Disc | Drum |
Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
EMI |
Rs. 4,002
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,318
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
Insurance | Rs. 11,807 Pulsar N160 Insurance | Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance |
Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
- Engine is very refined and tractable; sporty and confidence-inspiring handling; only bike with dual-channel ABS in the 160cc segment
- Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
- offering easy accessibility.
- Rear monoshock is firm
- resulting in a bouncy ride; not-very extensive features list; looks like a clone of the Pulsar N250
- The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Is Bajaj Pulsar N160 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
54% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar N160 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1798 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar N160 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of comfort and features. On the basis of performance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
Ratings Factor | Pulsar N160 | Hunter 350 |
---|---|---|
Mileage | 4.3 | 3.9 |
Performance | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Comfort | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Maintenance | 4.1 | 3.8 |
Features | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Bajaj Pulsar N160 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar N160Rs. 1.33 LakhvsTVSApache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.24 Lakh
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 Lakh
-
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 LakhvsRoyal EnfieldMeteor 350Rs. 2.05 Lakh
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar N160 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
Updated Bajaj Pulsar N160 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V: Image Comparison20 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Modified Into A Scrambler11 Jul, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar N160: Top 5 Highlights17 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
This Modified Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Is The Perfect Retro Scrambler12 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
EXCLUSIVE: Bajaj Pulsar N160 With Inverted Fork Launched At Rs 1.39 Lakh23 Apr, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
BREAKING: Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Gets Gorgeous New Colourways4 Jan, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar N150 And N160 Launched With Updated Instrument Console9 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Best Selling Royal Enfield Bikes In May 202329 Jun, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar N160 Spied Ahead Of Launch29 Jan, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Here’s How Much The Updated Royal Enfield Bikes Cost29 May, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
- HUNTER 350
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
- The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.