CFMoto 300NK vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]

  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. CFMoto 300NK vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]

300NK vs V-Strom SX[2022-2024] Key Highlights

Basic Info CFMoto 300NK STDSuzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024] STD
Rating
8 reviews
93 reviews
Brand Name CFMoto Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.29 Lakh Check On Road Price Rs. 2.11 Lakh
Engine Type Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft 4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Max Power 33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
CFMoto 300NK Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 6,270 @ 6% (36 months)
...
Insurance Rs. 12,541 300NK Insurance ...
Brochure N/A N/A

Engine Type
Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft
4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Engine Displacement
292.4 cc
249 cc
Max Power
33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Max Torque
20.5 Nm @ 7200 rpm
22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
78 mm
76.0 mm
Stroke
61.2 mm
54.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU
Electronic Ignition
Compression Ratio
11.3:1
10.7 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (Overall)
33 kmpl
32 kmpl
Top Speed
127 kmph
140 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - R17 Rear :-140/60 - R17
Front :-100/90-19 Rear :-140/70-17
Peak Power
33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
835 mm
Load carrying capacity
150 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
1990*780*1070 mm3
2180*880*1355 mm3
Wheelbase
1360 mm
1440 mm
Length
1990 mm
2180 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
205 mm
Height
1070 mm
1355 mm
Width
780 mm
880 mm
Fuel Capacity
12.5 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
151 Kg
167 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
795 mm
835 mm

Additional Features
...
Speed Exeeding Alert, ETA Updates
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
Steel tubular
...
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Adventure Tourer Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Tripmeter
...
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
...
Navigation
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Suzuki V-Strom SX [2022-2024]
  • Has loads of visual presence and looks like a big ADV bike. Handling is impressive by ADV standards. Relaxed riding ergonomics makes it a great tourer.
Suzuki V-Strom SX [2022-2024]
  • Stiff rear suspension means off-road performance is poor. Pricing is on the higher side. Flat spot in mid range means one has to work the engine for overtakes.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

CFMoto 300NK Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on CFMoto 300NK and Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better, Suzuki V-Strom SX or Royal Enfield Himalayan?
  • I will definitely go for Himalayan because Royal Enfiled is offering a whopping 400cc engine at lower cost like around 2.7-2.89 lakhs where as V- strom is just a 250cc engine costing around 2.6 lakhs. The didn't like the looks though.
  • One and only answer the most better now Suzuki V-Strom sx ❤️
  • Both vehicles are great in their own forte. Suzuki V-Strom SX has loads of visual presence and looks like a big ADV bike. Handling is impressive by ADV standards. Relaxed riding ergonomics make it a great tourer. On the other hand, Royal Enfield’s Himalayan offers a more engaging riding experience, but you also end up saving quite a lot of money. Himalayan has great ergonomics for touring or stand-up riding, long-travel suspension aids in brilliant off-road riding, spoked rims, and tall ground clearance, switchable ABS helps to lock the rear wheel under off-road conditions. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

CFMoto 300NK Vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024] FAQs

Which bike is best between CFMoto 300NK vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]?
Suzuki V-Strom SX [2022-2024] has out rated CFMoto 300NK on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper CFMoto 300NK vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]?
The Suzuki V-Strom SX [2022-2024] is cheaper than CFMoto 300NK by Rs. 17,400.
Which bike offers better performance CFMoto 300NK vs Suzuki V-Strom SX[2022-2024]?
For the STD version, 292.4 cc Petrol engine of 300NK produces 33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm of power and 20.5 Nm @ 7200 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 249 cc Petrol engine of V-Strom SX[2022-2024] produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the CFMoto 300NK has better performance.

Images of CFMoto 300NK and Suzuki V-Strom SX [2022-2024]

×
Select Category
✖
✖