KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

KTM RC 200 Price starts at Rs. 2.17 Lakh which is Rs. 67,796 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of KTM RC 200 is 35 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. KTM RC 200 is available in 3 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

RC 200 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights RC 200 GP EditionHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

RC 200 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info KTM RC 200 GP EditionRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
137 reviews
750 reviews
Brand Name KTM Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.17 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 25 PS @ 10000 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
KTM RC 200 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Dual Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 5,960 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,351 RC 200 Insurance Rs. 11,770 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure N/A
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
349.34 cc
Max Power
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
72 mm
75 mm
Stroke
49 mm
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
13.3:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (City)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
35 kmpl
36.2 kmpl
Top Speed
...
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Dry Weight
151 kg
...
Seat height
835 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
...
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
...
1370 mm
Length
...
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
156 mm
150 mm
Height
...
1055 mm
Width
...
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
13.7 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Lead Acid
...
Additional Features
Lubrication - Forced, Wet sump, Rider Aids - Supermoto ABS, Gear Position, Fuel Consumption
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

ABS
Dual Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
New LCD Dash display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 200
  • Sharp but forgiving handling; Meatier torque band aids overall driveability; More accessible ergonomics makes for a better all-rounder
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
KTM RC 200
  • Tyres lack edge grip
  • letting down the otherwise great handling package; It is a bit pricey; The edgy design is quite polarising
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

KTM RC 200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on KTM RC 200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|KTM RC 200 Community

KTM RC 200 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is cheaper KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than KTM RC 200 by Rs. 67,796.
Which bike offers better performance KTM RC 200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the GP Edition version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of RC 200 produces 25 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and KTM RC 200

Which one do you like more?
RC 200
RC 200
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Recently Visited
Select Category
✖
✖