Odysse Electric Vader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Odysse Electric VADER Price starts at Rs. 1.61 Lakh which is Rs. 11,674 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Odysse Electric VADER is available in 5 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Odysse Electric VADER vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Vader vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Vader STDHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Top Speed 85 km/Hr 114 kmph
Charging Time 4 Hr ...
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Odysse Electric Vader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Vader vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Odysse Electric Vader STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
3 reviews
752 reviews
Brand Name Odysse Electric Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.61 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power ... 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Odysse Electric Vader Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
Charging Time 4 Hr ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI ...
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 5,038 Vader Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Torque (motor)
170 Nm
...
Engine Type
...
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
...
349.34 cc
Max Power
...
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
...
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Continuous Power
4500 W
...
Bore
...
75 mm
Stroke
...
85.8 mm
Motor IP Rating
IP67
...
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Hub Motor
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
...
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
69.42m
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
16.43s
Top Speed
85 km/Hr
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
...
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
...
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
...
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
150 kg
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
2065*750*1060 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
1365 mm
1370 mm
Length
2065 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
110 mm
150 mm
Height
1060 mm
1055 mm
Width
750 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
128 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
...
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
240 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
153 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
3000
...
Additional Features
Immobilization, Low battery Alert, Whopping 18 Litres of Storage Space, Parking Mode, Smart controller with CAN communication
...
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Music control
...
OTA
...
Fast Charging
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Range (Eco Mode)
125 km/charge
...
Battery Capacity
3.7 Kwh
...
Charging Time
4 Hr
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
...
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth,WiFi
...
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
7-inch Android Display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
...
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Geo Fencing
...
Cooling System
...
Air & Oil Cooled
Anti Theft Alarm
...
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Odysse Electric Vader and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Odysse Electric VADER Community

Odysse Electric Vader Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Odysse Electric Vader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
Odysse Electric VADER has out rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Odysse Electric Vader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Odysse Electric VADER by Rs. 11,674.
Which bike offers better performance Odysse Electric Vader vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences the Odysse Electric VADER has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Odysse Electric VADER

Which one do you like more?
Vader
Vader
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Select Category
✖
✖