Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Tork Kratos R

Tork Kratos R Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 99 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while Tork Kratos R comes with 5 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Tork Kratos R can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Kratos R

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroKratos R STD
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine ...
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm ...
Top Speed 114 kmph 105 km/Hr
Range ... 180 km/charge
Charging Time ... 6-7 Hr

Hunter 350 vs Kratos R Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTork Kratos R STD
Rating
750 reviews
94 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Tork
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine ...
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm ...
Fuel Type Petrol Electric
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Tork Kratos R Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Braking Type ... Combine Braking System
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Range ... 180 km/charge
Charging Time ... 6-7 Hr
ABS Single Channel ...
Starting Self Start Only Push Button Start
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
...
Insurance Rs. 11,770 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 8,937 Kratos R Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Torque (motor)
...
38 Nm
Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
...
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
...
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
...
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
...
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
...
Bore
75 mm
...
Stroke
85.8 mm
...
Motor IP Rating
...
IP67
No Of Cylinders
1
...
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Mid Drive Electric Motor
Valve Per Cylinder
2
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Electric
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc
Braking Type
...
Combine Braking System

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
105 km/Hr

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/80-17, Rear :-120/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
798 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
150 kg
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
...
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1340 mm
Length
2055 mm
1960 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
165 mm
Height
1055 mm
...
Width
800 mm
...
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
...
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
140 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
267 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
230 mm

Battery Type
...
Li-ion
Motor Type
...
Axial Flux - PM
Additional Features
...
Vehicle Locator, Active Throttle Control, Front storage box, Hazard Lights, Reverse Speed 5 kmph,Safe home feature, Remote Charge Status, Vacation Mode, Track Mode, Forced air cooled, Riding Mode - ECO-Sports-City, Motor Walk Assist, Crash Alert, Ride Analytics, Track mode Analytics, Smart Analytics, Guide me Home Lights.
Claimed range
...
180 km/charge
Charging network / Battery swapping network
...
USB charging port
OTA
...
Range
...
180 km/charge
Fast Charging
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Range (Eco Mode)
...
120 km/charge
Range (Normal Mode)
...
100 km/charge
Charging Time
...
6-7 Hr
Charging Time(0-80%)
...
60 minute
Range (Sport Mode)
...
70 km/charge
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

ABS
Single Channel
...
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Electric Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Push Button Start
Seat Type
Single
Split
Display
...
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Digital
...
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
...
16°
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Footrest
...
Geo Fencing
...
Charger Output
...
750 W
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
...
Anti Theft Alarm
...
Odometer
Digital
...
Navigation
EBS
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
...
3
Standard Warranty (kilometers)
...
40000

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Tork Kratos R
  • Easy and sporty ergonomics; Handles quite well; Motor has a strong mid-range pull
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Tork Kratos R
  • Thermal management system intervenes too quickly; Fit and finish levels need to be improved; Ride could be a tad bit plusher
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Tork Kratos R FAQs

Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Tork Kratos R?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Tork Kratos R by Rs. 99.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Tork Kratos R

×
Recently Visited
Select Category