Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400

Hunter 350 vs Speed 400 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTriumph Speed 400 STD
Rating
758 reviews
83 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Triumph
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 2.40 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Liquid-cooled, 4 valve, DOHC, single-cylinder
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 40 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Triumph Speed 400 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 6,571 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 23,780 Speed 400 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
N/A

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Liquid-cooled, 4 valve, DOHC, single-cylinder
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
398.15 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
40 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
37.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
89.0 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
64.0 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
12:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
30 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
145 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-110/80-17, Rear :-150/70-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
40 PS @ 8000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
...
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1377 mm
Length
2055 mm
...
Ground Clearance
150 mm
...
Height
1055 mm
1084 mm
Width
800 mm
814 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
176 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
230 mm

USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Hybrid spine/perimeter, tubular steel, bolt-on rear subframe
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Roadster Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Analogue
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Standard Warranty (Years)
...
2

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Triumph Speed 400
  • Exciting and friendly performance
  • Comfortable yet sporty riding dynamics
  • Build quality is premium
  • Phenomenal pricing
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Triumph Speed 400
  • Sharper braking would’ve been appreciated
  • Lacks ‘smart’ features

Is Triumph Speed 400 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

57% users have chosen Triumph Speed 400 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1297 users have also rated Triumph Speed 400 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Triumph Speed 400 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and features in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage and maintenance.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Speed 400 Hunter 350
Mileage 3.5 3.9
Performance 4.5 4.4
Comfort 4.6 4.5
Maintenance 3.6 3.8
Features 4.8 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Triumph Speed 400 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Triumph Speed 400 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Triumph Speed 400 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Triumph Speed 400 by Rs. 90,100.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Triumph Speed 400?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 398.15 cc Petrol engine of Speed 400 produces 40 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 37.5 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Triumph Speed 400

×
Select Category