Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 29,480 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 priced at Rs. 1.20 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 is 47 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 comes with 7 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroApache RTR 160 Black Edition
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS Apache RTR 160 Black Edition
Rating
746 reviews
1066 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.20 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 160 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,469 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,715 Apache RTR 160 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
159.7 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
13.85 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
...
Stroke
85.8 mm
...
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
47 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
107 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-110/80-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2085*730*1105 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1300 mm
Length
2055 mm
2085 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
180 mm
Height
1055 mm
1105 mm
Width
800 mm
730 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
137 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
130 mm

Additional Features
...
(Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 97 kmph), (Maximum Power - Urban/Rain Mode - 13.32 PS @ 8000 rpm), (Maximum Torque - Urban/Rain Mode - 12.7 Nm @ 6500 rpm), Position Lamp, Roto Petal Disc Brake, Brake Fluid - DOT 3/DOT 4, Glide Through Technology
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
AHO, LED Headlamp with all time on LED Position Lamp
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Synchro STIFF
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
...
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
TVS Apache RTR 160
  • Great engine tractability due to TVS Glide Through Technology (GTT)
  • Top-end variant is feature rich
  • Sporty and muscular design
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
TVS Apache RTR 160
  • Front-end feels unsettled at higher speeds
  • Brakes could have been better
  • Top-end variant is very expensive

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 160?

61% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over TVS Apache RTR 160 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 7149 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and features in your bike. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Apache RTR 160
Mileage 3.9 3.8
Performance 4.4 4.2
Comfort 4.5 4.0
Maintenance 3.8 3.8
Features 4.6 4.1
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and features in your bike. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
The TVS Apache RTR 160 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 29,480.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Black Edition version, 159.7 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 160 produces 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 13.85 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160

×
Select Category