Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 25,030 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V priced at Rs. 1.24 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is 49.80 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by 159 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 4V comes with 11 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroApache RTR 160 4V Black Edition
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 160 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS Apache RTR 160 4V Black Edition
Rating
747 reviews
547 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.24 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,597 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 10,790 Apache RTR 160 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
SI, 4 stroke, Oil cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
159. 7 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
62 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
52.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
21.51 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
38.36 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-110/80-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2035*790*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1357 mm
Length
2055 mm
2035 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
180 mm
Height
1055 mm
1050 mm
Width
800 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
144 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
130 mm

Additional Features
...
(Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 103 kmph), (Maximum Power - Urban/Rain Mode - 15.64 PS @ 8600 rpm), (Maximum Torque - Urban/Rain Mode - 14.14 Nm @ 7250 rpm), Oil cooled with ram air Assist, MF Battery, Muffler - Bullpup exhaust design, Position Lamp, Gear Indicator, Adjustable Levers, Glide Through Technology
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
...
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
  • Good ride quality and handles really well
  • Impressive engine performance
  • The instrument cluster is loaded with useful features
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
TVS Apache RTR 160 4V
  • The brakes could have been better
  • Narrower rear tyre as compared to its rivals

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?

52% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over TVS Apache RTR 160 4V in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 4216 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has out rated TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on all the rating factors.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Apache RTR 160 4V
Mileage 3.9 3.8
Performance 4.4 4.3
Comfort 4.5 4.1
Maintenance 3.8 3.7
Features 4.6 4.3
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 160 4V Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has out rated TVS Apache RTR 160 4V on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 25,030.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 160 4V?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Black Edition version, 159. 7 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 160 4V produces 17.55 PS @ 9250 rpm of power and 14.73 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 160 4V

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
Apache RTR 160 4V
Apache RTR 160 4V
×
Recently Visited
Select Category
✖
✖