Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 1,280 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V priced at Rs. 1.48 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is 37 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is powered by 197.75 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 200 4V comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroApache RTR 200 4V Dual Channel ABS
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Hunter 350 vs Apache RTR 200 4V Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroTVS Apache RTR 200 4V Dual Channel ABS
Rating
763 reviews
316 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.48 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,282 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,211 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 11,189 Apache RTR 200 4V Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Si, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled, Fi
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
197.75 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
66 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
57.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
Mapped ignition system
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.0:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
16 mm
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
29.46 mm
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
37 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
12.23s
Top Speed
114 kmph
127 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-130/70-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2020*790*1050 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1353 mm
Length
2055 mm
2020 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
180 mm
Height
1055 mm
1050 mm
Width
800 mm
790 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
152 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
800 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
...
(Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 105 kmph), (Maximum Torque Urban/Rain Mode - 16.51 Nm @ 5750 rpm), (Maximum Power Urban/Rain Mode - 17.3 PS @ 7800 rpm), Oil cooled with ram air Assist, TVS SmartXonnect, Glide Through Technology, Muffler - Twin pipe and twin barrel Design, Max Speed Adjustable Levers, Race Tuned Fuel Injection, Race Tuned Slipper Clutch, Racing Double Barrel Exhaust, Control Switch, Race Telemetry, Lean Angle Mode, Crash Alert, Idle Speed - 1550 ± 200 rpm, Air Cleaner Type - Viscous Paper Filter, Brake Fluid - DOT 3/DOT 4
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 8AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Double Cradle Split Synchro Stiff Frame
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Aggressive styling which makes it stand out
  • Offers a lot of modern features
  • Adjustable suspension makes it quite versatile
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
TVS Apache RTR 200 4V
  • Lacks a 6th gear which takes away from its touring potential
  • Slightly cramped ergonomics for taller riders
  • Design feels a bit too similar to the Apache RTR 160 4V

Is TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

53% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 200 4V over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 2894 users have also rated TVS Apache RTR 200 4V and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hunter 350 Apache RTR 200 4V
Mileage 3.8 3.9
Performance 4.4 4.4
Comfort 4.3 4.5
Maintenance 3.8 3.8
Features 4.5 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 200 4V Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
|Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Community

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, comfort and features in your bike. On the basis of performance and maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
The TVS Apache RTR 200 4V is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 1,280.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Apache RTR 200 4V?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Dual Channel ABS version, 197.75 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 200 4V produces 20.82 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 17.25 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences in terms of performance both are same.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and TVS Apache RTR 200 4V

Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
Apache RTR 200 4V
Apache RTR 200 4V
×
Select Category
✖
✖