Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha Aerox 155

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 2,000 costlier than base model of Yamaha Aerox 155 priced at Rs. 1.47 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha Aerox 155 is 45 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while Yamaha Aerox 155 is powered by 155 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha Aerox 155 comes with 4 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha Aerox 155 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs Aerox 155

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroAerox 155 STD
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 15 PS @ 8000 rpm

Hunter 350 vs Aerox 155 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroYamaha Aerox 155 STD
Rating
733 reviews
143 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.47 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 15 PS @ 8000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Yamaha Aerox 155 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-355.6 mm,Rear :-355.6 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,261 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 14,153 Aerox 155 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
155 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
15 PS @ 8000 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
13.9 Nm @ 6500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Belt Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
TCI
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
11.6:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
20.32m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
38.53m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (City)
...
48.62 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
42.26 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
48.62 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
18.51s
Top Speed
114 kmph
111 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :- 110/80-14, Rear :- 140/70-14
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
15 PS @ 8000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-355.6 mm,Rear :-355.6 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
1980*700*1150 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1350 mm
Length
2055 mm
1980 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
145 mm
Height
1055 mm
1150 mm
Width
800 mm
700 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
5.5 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
126 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
230 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
130 mm

Additional Features
...
VVA, Y-Connect, E20 Compatible, Oil Change Tripmeter, Hazard Warning, Smart Motor Generator System
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Seat Opening Switch
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
Underbone
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
...
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
External Fuel Filling
...
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Underseat storage
...
24.5 L
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Shutter Lock
...
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Yamaha Aerox 155
  • Amazing performance
  • Incredible handling
  • Sporty looks
  • Generous under-seat storage
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Yamaha Aerox 155
  • Jarring ride quality
  • Brakes not powerful enough
  • No floor space

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Yamaha Aerox 155?

50% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Yamaha Aerox 155 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1458 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha Aerox 155 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But Yamaha Aerox 155 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and maintenance. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Aerox 155 Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 4.2
Performance 4.4 4.5
Comfort 4.5 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 3.9
Features 4.6 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha Aerox 155 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Yamaha Aerox 155 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
As per the users experiences Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But Yamaha Aerox 155 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and maintenance. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
The Yamaha Aerox 155 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 2,000.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha Aerox 155?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of Aerox 155 produces 15 PS @ 8000 rpm of power and 13.9 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha Aerox 155

×
Select Category