Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 20,000 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZS-FI V4 priced at Rs. 1.29 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha FZS-FI V4 is 46 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while Yamaha FZS-FI V4 is powered by 149 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while Yamaha FZS-FI V4 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs FZS-FI V4

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroFZS-FI V4 Deluxe
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm

Hunter 350 vs FZS-FI V4 Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroYamaha FZS-FI V4 Deluxe
Rating
747 reviews
64 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.29 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Yamaha FZS-FI V4 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 3,742 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 9,134 FZS-FI V4 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
149 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
57.3 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
57.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.6 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
46 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
...

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
1990*2000*1080 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1330 mm
Length
2055 mm
1990 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
165 mm
Height
1055 mm
1080 mm
Width
800 mm
2000 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
135 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
220 mm

Additional Features
...
Y-Connect, Side Stand engine cut-off switch
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Charging at Home
...
Charging at Charging Station
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
...
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Optional
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
Digital
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.

Is Yamaha FZS-FI V4 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

52% users have chosen Yamaha FZS-FI V4 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1251 users have also rated Yamaha FZS-FI V4 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Yamaha FZS-FI V4 has out rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on all the rating factors.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor FZS-FI V4 Hunter 350
Mileage 4.5 3.9
Performance 4.6 4.4
Comfort 4.6 4.5
Maintenance 4.4 3.8
Features 4.7 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha FZS-FI V4 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZS-FI V4

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
  • The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4 FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4?
Yamaha FZS-FI V4 has out rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4?
The Yamaha FZS-FI V4 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 20,000.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Yamaha FZS-FI V4?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Deluxe version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZS-FI V4 produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZS-FI V4

×
Select Category