New Car
Explore all New Cars of 2024
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Price starts at Rs. 1.58 Lakh which is Rs. 9,076 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.
Pulsar NS200 vs Hunter 350
| Key Highlights | Pulsar NS200 STD | Hunter 350 Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
| Max Power | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
Rs. 1.58 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,752 View December OffersRoyal Enfield Hunter 350
Rs. 1.49 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,318 View December Offers
Pulsar NS200 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar NS200 STD | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
996 reviews
|
737 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Royal Enfield |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.58 Lakh Get On-Road Price | Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price |
| Engine Type | Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine |
| Max Power | 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm | 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Drum |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Spoke |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Single Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,752
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 4,318
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,363 Pulsar NS200 Insurance | Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
- Sporty handling characteristics
- the 6-speed gearbox proves advantageous on the highway
- and commendable performance considering the price point
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
- offering easy accessibility.
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
- Design looks dated now
- lacks adequate features and the absence of dual-channel ABS is a miss
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Is Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
51% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS200 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 5319 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Hunter 350 | Pulsar NS200 |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| Performance | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Comfort | 4.3 | 4.5 |
| Maintenance | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Features | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
- Interact with community
- Become a Top Contributor
Add Car
Add Bike
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
5 Bike Launches In June 2022: Bajaj Pulsar N160, Royal Enfield Hunter 350, TVS Zeppelin, And More 1 Jun, 2022 7344 views
-
5 Bike Launches In July 2022: TVS Zeppelin, Ducati Streetfighter V4 SP, Suzuki Katana, RE Hunter 350 and more 2 Jul, 2022 57455 views
-
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs TVS Ronin Comparison Review | Distinct Yet Contrasting | Zigwheels.com 8 Sep, 2022 4253 views
-
2023 Bajaj Pulsar NS160 & Pulsar NS200 Walkaround | Revised hardware, new features and…? | Zigwheels 14 Mar, 2023 7058 views
-
Kawasaki W175 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro Bikes Compared | Does The Kwacker Make Sense? 29 Jan, 2023 6224 views
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar NS200Rs. 1.58 LakhvsPulsar NS200 vs Apache RTR 160 4V
TVSApache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.24 Lakh -
BajajPulsar NS200Rs. 1.58 LakhvsPulsar NS200 vs Apache RTR 200 4V
TVSApache RTR 200 4VRs. 1.48 Lakh
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 LakhvsHunter 350 vs Classic 350
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 Lakh -
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 LakhvsHunter 350 vs Meteor 350
Royal EnfieldMeteor 350Rs. 2.05 Lakh
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS Family Explained: Pulsar NS125, Pulsar NS160 and Pulsar NS20017 Mar, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels -
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Modified Into A Scrambler11 Jul, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs KTM Duke 200: Image Comparison10 Mar, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
This Modified Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Is The Perfect Retro Scrambler12 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and NS160 Reaches Dealerships Ahead Of Launch26 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
BREAKING: Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Gets Gorgeous New Colourways4 Jan, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Weekly Bike News Wrapup: 2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and NS160 Unveiled, Kawasaki Ninja 500 Launched, And More!24 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Best Selling Royal Enfield Bikes In May 202329 Jun, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200’s New Headlight & Instrument Console Teased15 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Here’s How Much The Updated Royal Enfield Bikes Cost29 May, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
- HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
- Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
Q. Which is better, Royal Enfield Hunter or TVS Ronin?
- The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. And to top it off, Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, The Ronin is surely a brave new step for TVS. But despite the premium features and hardware, it does not entirely qualify as a jack-of-all-trades. It’s a well-rounded urban motorcycle dispatching city commutes with ease, but on the open road, it lacks oomph. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs
Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of mileage, comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar NS200 by Rs. 9,076.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 has better performance.
Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Bajaj Pulsar NS200
Which one do you like more?
Hunter 350
Pulsar NS200
×