CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200

CFMoto 300NK Price starts at Rs. 2.29 Lakh which is Rs. 11,304 costlier than base model of KTM RC 200 priced at Rs. 2.17 Lakh. The claimed mileage of CFMoto 300NK is 33 kmpl whereas the mileage of KTM RC 200 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, CFMoto 300NK is powered by 292.4 cc engine , while KTM RC 200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine. CFMoto 300NK is available in 2 different colours while KTM RC 200 comes with 3 colours. The Comparison CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

300NK vs RC 200

Key Highlights 300NK STDRC 200 GP Edition
Engine Type Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Max Power 33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200

300NK vs RC 200 Key Highlights

Basic Info CFMoto 300NK STDKTM RC 200 GP Edition
Rating
8 reviews
135 reviews
Brand Name CFMoto KTM
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.29 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 2.17 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Max Power 33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm 25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
CFMoto 300NK Colors
KTM RC 200 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 6,270 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 5,960 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,541 300NK Insurance Rs. 12,351 RC 200 Insurance
Brochure N/A N/A

Engine Type
Single cylinder,4-stroke,Liquid cooled,4-value,DOHC,Balance shaft
Single Cylinder, Liquid Cooled, DOHC, FI Engine
Engine Displacement
292.4 cc
199.5 cc
Max Power
33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
20.5 Nm @ 7200 rpm
19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
78 mm
72 mm
Stroke
61.2 mm
49 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU
Contactless, Controlled, Fully Electronic Ignition System With Digital Ignition Timing Adjustment
Compression Ratio
11.3:1
13.3:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (City)
...
35 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
35 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
33 kmpl
35 kmpl

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70 - R17 Rear :-140/60 - R17
Front :-110/70 - 17, Rear :-150/60 - 17
Peak Power
33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm
25 PS @ 10000 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Dry Weight
...
151 kg
Seat height
795 mm
835 mm
Load carrying capacity
150 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
1990*780*1070 mm3
...
Wheelbase
1360 mm
...
Length
1990 mm
...
Ground Clearance
150 mm
156 mm
Height
1070 mm
...
Width
780 mm
...
Fuel Capacity
12.5 Liters
13.7 Liters
Kerb Weight
151 Kg
160 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
795 mm
835 mm
Front Brake Diameter
...
320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
...
230 mm

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Additional Features
...
Lubrication - Forced, Wet sump, Rider Aids - Supermoto ABS, Gear Position, Fuel Consumption
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Frame
Steel tubular
Split-Trellis frame (Tubular), Sub Frame - Newly engineered bolt-on subframe
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
New LCD Dash display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
...
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 200
  • Sharp but forgiving handling; Meatier torque band aids overall driveability; More accessible ergonomics makes for a better all-rounder
KTM RC 200
  • Tyres lack edge grip
  • letting down the otherwise great handling package; It is a bit pricey; The edgy design is quite polarising
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of CFMoto 300NK and KTM RC 200

CFMoto 300NK Comparison with Similar Bikes

KTM RC 200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on CFMoto 300NK and KTM RC 200

CFMoto 300NK Vs KTM RC 200 FAQs

Which bike is best between CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200?
As per the users experiences CFMoto 300NK is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But KTM RC 200 is better on the grounds of features. On the basis of mileage user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200?
The KTM RC 200 is cheaper than CFMoto 300NK by Rs. 11,304.
Which bike offers better performance CFMoto 300NK vs KTM RC 200?
For the STD version, 292.4 cc Petrol engine of 300NK produces 33.99 PS @ 8800 rpm of power and 20.5 Nm @ 7200 rpm of torque. Whereas for the GP Edition version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of RC 200 produces 25 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 19.2 Nm at 8000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the CFMoto 300NK has better performance.

Images of KTM RC 200 and CFMoto 300NK

Which one do you like more?
RC 200
RC 200
300NK
300NK
×
Select Category
✖
✖