Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX

Suzuki V-Strom SX Price starts at Rs. 2.11 Lakh which is Rs. 61,700 costlier than base model of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 priced at Rs. 1.49 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl whereas the mileage of Suzuki V-Strom SX is 32 kmpl. In technical specifications, Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine , while Suzuki V-Strom SX is powered by 249 cc engine. Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is available in 8 different colours while Suzuki V-Strom SX comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hunter 350 vs V-Strom SX

Key Highlights Hunter 350 RetroV-Strom SX STD
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine 4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm

Hunter 350 vs V-Strom SX Key Highlights

Basic Info Royal Enfield Hunter 350 RetroSuzuki V-Strom SX STD
Rating
755 reviews
93 reviews
Brand Name Royal Enfield Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 2.11 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine 4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Suzuki V-Strom SX Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
ABS Single Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Analogue Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 5,794 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance Rs. 14,195 V-Strom SX Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
4-stroke, Single-cylinder, oil-cooled, SOHC
Engine Displacement
349.34 cc
249 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Max Torque
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
75 mm
76.0 mm
Stroke
85.8 mm
54.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
ECU controlled
Electronic Ignition
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
10.7 : 1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
21.29m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
36.71m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
69.42m
...
Mileage (Overall)
36.2 kmpl
32 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
16.43s
...
Top Speed
114 kmph
...

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/90-19 Rear :-140/70-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-482.6 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
29 psi
...

Seat height
790 mm
835 mm
Load carrying capacity
179 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2055*800*1055 mm3
2180*880*1355 mm3
Wheelbase
1370 mm
1440 mm
Length
2055 mm
2180 mm
Ground Clearance
150 mm
205 mm
Height
1055 mm
1355 mm
Width
800 mm
880 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
177 Kg
167 Kg
Total Weight
360 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
790 mm
835 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
...
Rear Brake Diameter
153 mm
...

Additional Features
...
Speed Exeeding Alert, ETA Updates
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
Bulb

Frame
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
...
ABS
Single Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Cruiser Bikes
Adventure Tourer Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Analogue and Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Analogue
Digital
Tachometer
Digital
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air & Oil Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
...
Navigation
Service Due Indicator
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Suzuki V-Strom SX
  • Has loads of visual presence and looks like a big ADV bike. Handling is impressive by ADV standards. Relaxed riding ergonomics makes it a great tourer.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.
Suzuki V-Strom SX
  • Stiff rear suspension means off-road performance is poor. Pricing is on the higher side. Flat spot in mid range means one has to work the engine for overtakes.

Is Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Better Than Suzuki V-Strom SX?

57% users have chosen Royal Enfield Hunter 350 over Suzuki V-Strom SX in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1285 users have also rated Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Suzuki V-Strom SX on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Suzuki V-Strom SX is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor V-Strom SX Hunter 350
Mileage 3.9 4.4
Performance 4.4 4.8
Comfort 4.5 4.8
Maintenance 3.8 4.5
Features 4.6 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Suzuki V-Strom SX Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Suzuki V-Strom SX

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is better, Suzuki V-Strom SX or Royal Enfield Himalayan?
  • I will definitely go for Himalayan because Royal Enfiled is offering a whopping 400cc engine at lower cost like around 2.7-2.89 lakhs where as V- strom is just a 250cc engine costing around 2.6 lakhs. The didn't like the looks though.
  • One and only answer the most better now Suzuki V-Strom sx ❤️
  • Both vehicles are great in their own forte. Suzuki V-Strom SX has loads of visual presence and looks like a big ADV bike. Handling is impressive by ADV standards. Relaxed riding ergonomics make it a great tourer. On the other hand, Royal Enfield’s Himalayan offers a more engaging riding experience, but you also end up saving quite a lot of money. Himalayan has great ergonomics for touring or stand-up riding, long-travel suspension aids in brilliant off-road riding, spoked rims, and tall ground clearance, switchable ABS helps to lock the rear wheel under off-road conditions. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for dealership details.
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Vs Suzuki V-Strom SX FAQs

Which bike is best between Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
Suzuki V-Strom SX is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance. On the basis of features user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is cheaper than Suzuki V-Strom SX by Rs. 61,700.
Which bike offers better performance Royal Enfield Hunter 350 vs Suzuki V-Strom SX?
For the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 249 cc Petrol engine of V-Strom SX produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Suzuki V-Strom SX

×
Select Category