Atumobile AtumVader vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160

Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Price starts at Rs. 1.18 Lakh which is Rs. 10,066 costlier than base model of Atumobile AtumVader priced at Rs. 1.08 Lakh. In technical specifications, Bajaj Avenger Street 160 is powered by 160 cc engine. Atumobile AtumVader is available in 5 different colours while Bajaj Avenger Street 160 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Atumobile AtumVader vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

AtumVader vs Avenger Street 160

Key Highlights AtumVader SAvenger Street 160 BS6
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled
Max Power 2.9 kW 15 PS @ 8500 rpm
Top Speed 65 km/Hr ...
Range 100 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4 Hr ...

AtumVader vs Avenger Street 160 Key Highlights

Basic Info Atumobile AtumVader SBajaj Avenger Street 160 BS6
Rating
6 reviews
227 reviews
Brand Name Atumobile Bajaj
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.08 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.18 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type ... Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled
Max Power 2.9 kW 15 PS @ 8500 rpm
Fuel Type Electric Petrol
Colors
Atumobile AtumVader Colors
Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Colors
Brakes Front Drum Disc
Brakes Rear Drum Drum
Braking Type Combi Brake System ...
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-381 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Spoke Alloy
Range 100 km/charge ...
Charging Time 4 Hr ...
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Push Button Start Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
Running Cost Rs. 0.19/km Rs. 2.12/km
EMI ...
Rs. 3,544 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 4,402 AtumVader Insurance Rs. 10,684 Avenger Street 160 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
N/A

Torque (motor)
110 Nm
...
Engine Type
...
Single cylinder, Twin Spark DTS-i , Fuel Injected, 4 stroke, SOHC, 2 valve, Air cooled
Engine Displacement
...
160 cc
Max Power
2.9 kW
15 PS @ 8500 rpm
Max Torque
...
13.7 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Emission Type
...
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
58 mm
Stroke
...
60.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
...
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Fuel Type
Electric
Petrol

Brakes Front
Drum
Disc
Brakes Rear
Drum
Drum
Braking Type
Combi Brake System
...

Mileage (City)
...
47.2 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
...
50.77 kmpl
Top Speed
65 km/Hr
...

Tyre Size
Front :-100/90-17 Rear :-100/90-17
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :- 130/90-15
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-381 mm
Tyre Type
Tube
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Spoke
Alloy
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
30 psi
...

Seat height
800 mm
737 mm
Length*Width*Height
2068*781*1220 mm3
2210*806*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1490 mm
Length
2068 mm
2210 mm
Ground Clearance
227 mm
169 mm
Height
1220 mm
1070 mm
Width
781 mm
806 mm
Fuel Capacity
...
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
114 Kg
156 Kg
Total Weight
194 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
130 mm
280 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
130 mm
130 mm

Battery Type
Li-ion
...
Motor Type
BLDC
...
Additional Features
Riding Mode - Eco | Drive | Sport | Reverse, Charger Cut Off Sensor, Combination Switch, Brake Lever Cut Off Switches, Battery Charging Percentage
...
Claimed range
100 km/charge
...
Call/SMS alerts
...
Music control
...
Range
100 km/charge
...
Headlight
LED with AHO
Halogen
Charging at Home
...
Range (Eco Mode)
100 km/charge
...
Battery Capacity
2.9 Kwh
...
Charging Time
4 Hr
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Cruise Control
...
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Electric Bikes, Cafe Racer Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Starting
Push Button Start
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Display
...
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Handle Type
...
Street Control
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Charging Point
...
Gradeability
7 Degree
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
...
Passenger Backrest
...
Sporty
Underseat storage
14 L
...
Charger Output
15 Amp.
...
Cooling System
...
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
EBS
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Avenger Street 160
  • Has classic cruiser styling with the low seating position
  • forward-set footpegs and easy-to-reach handlebars; Most affordable cruiser in the Indian two-wheeler market and a great city bike
Bajaj Avenger Street 160
  • It should’ve gotten dual-channel ABS; There is room for improvement in the mileage output; The build quality is not the best
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Videos of Atumobile AtumVader and Bajaj Avenger Street 160

Bajaj Avenger Street 160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Atumobile AtumVader and Bajaj Avenger Street 160

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which is the better option for city ride and sometimes 100 km tour in long-distance bajaj avenger 160 or Yamaha fzx?
  • The lazy rake angle and the ridiculously long wheelbase of 1480mm might lead you to believe that the Avenger would have a very vague feeling front end and wouldn’t be a nimble handler. But that really isn’t the case. While it wouldn’t be our first choice for some corner-carving action, the front does feel stable enough through the bends. And it turns rather quickly too. But this agility is a bigger boon in the city, where darting through traffic feels easy enough - a good thing as the Avenger 160 is really more of an urban cruiser than an out-and-out highway tourer. On the other hand, if we talk about FZ-X, compared to the regular FZ-FI, the FZ-X’s handlebars are taller and pulled closer to the rider, and the footpegs have been moved quite a bit forwards. So you end up sitting in a very commuters stance. Combine that with the very soft seat and you’re bound to have a back and butt ache if you spend a long time in the saddle. Then there’s the highway performance. You’ll only be able to maintain speeds of about 80-85kmph comfortably on the highway. Anything faster than that makes the bike feel rather strained. And because of this, highway efficiency, while fairly ok at 48.67kmpl, takes a bit of a hit compared to city efficiency. For a better understanding of performance and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership..Read more:- Yamaha FZ-X: Road Test ReviewRead more:- 2019 Bajaj Avenger Street 160 ABS: Road Test Review
Q. Is Avenger 220 Street worth the purchase for touring as there would be a pillion with me or Avenger 180 or 160 would be a better choice to go with? Planning to purchase in 2022.
  • Yes
  • As per your requirements, Bajaj Avenger Cruise 220 could prove to be a good option. The seat is cushioned well and wide enough for the comfort of the rider. However, the same can out be said about the pillion seat. What's more, the Cruise 220’s handlebars are relatively taller and narrower making it slightly difficult to guide around tight bends. Furthermore, the Bajaj Avenger 180 is no longer available for sale in the market. As for the Avenger Street 160, it offers a smooth engine, comfortable ride quality and reassuring braking prowess. The Avenger Street 160 simply proves that there indeed can be a replacement for displacement. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you to take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which one is best for daily commute for 50 km Ntorq or Avenger 160 street?
  • Avenger 160 street is the best
  • Both are different segment vehicles and come under different price ranges too. If you're looking for a fast, fun to ride and feature-rich scooter at a price, the TVS Ntorq 125 is the right choice for you. It still remains the benchmark for performance in its class and the sporty styling adds to its appeal. Our only grouse is the premium pricing post the BS6 update. On the other hand, if budget is not an issue and want better power performance and comfortable ride quality, you may go for Bajaj Avenger Street 160. you may compare both vehicles accordingly. Do take a test ride in order to get better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.

Atumobile AtumVader Vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160 FAQs

Which bike is best between Atumobile AtumVader vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160?
Bajaj Avenger Street 160 has out rated Atumobile AtumVader on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Atumobile AtumVader vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160?
The Atumobile AtumVader is cheaper than Bajaj Avenger Street 160 by Rs. 10,066.
Which bike offers better performance Atumobile AtumVader vs Bajaj Avenger Street 160?
As per the users experiences the Atumobile AtumVader has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Avenger Street 160 and Atumobile AtumVader

×
Recently Visited
Select Category