New Car
Explore all New Cars of 2024
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Price starts at Rs. 1.84 Lakh which is Rs. 43,974 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F priced at Rs. 1.41 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine , while Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is powered by 373.27 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 3 different colours while Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z comes with 4 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z can be described on the basis of price and specifications.
Pulsar 220 F vs Pulsar NS400Z
| Key Highlights | Pulsar 220 F STD | Pulsar NS400Z STD |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC with DLC coated finger followers |
| Max Power | 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm | 40 PS @ 8800 rpm |
-
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
Rs. 1.41 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,215 View November OffersBajaj Pulsar NS400Z
Rs. 1.84 Lakh EMI - Rs. 5,529 View November Offers
Pulsar 220 F vs Pulsar NS400Z Key Highlights
| Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar 220 F STD | Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z STD |
|---|---|---|
| Rating |
538 reviews
|
47 reviews
|
| Brand Name | Bajaj | Bajaj |
| Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.41 Lakh Get On-Road Price | Rs. 1.84 Lakh Get On-Road Price |
| Engine Type | Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled | Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC with DLC coated finger followers |
| Max Power | 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm | 40 PS @ 8800 rpm |
| Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
| Colors | ||
| Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
| Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
| Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
| Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
| ABS | ... | Dual Channel |
| Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
| Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
| EMI |
Rs. 4,215
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 5,529
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
| Insurance | Rs. 11,062 Pulsar 220 F Insurance | Rs. 22,160 Pulsar NS400Z Insurance |
| Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
- Touring-friendly dynamics
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Value-for-money
- Powerful motor offers thrilling performance
- Strong brakes
- Wide
- upright handlebar and comfortable seat
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
- Still looks the same
- has lost the value proposition
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
- Engine does not feel as refined as the N series Pulsars
- Suspension setup is on the stiffer side
- Misses out on a radial tyre at the front
Is Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Better Than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F?
62% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 3567 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and Bajaj Pulsar 220 F on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort and features in your bike. But Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is better on the grounds of mileage, performance and maintenance.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
| Ratings Factor | Pulsar NS400Z | Pulsar 220 F |
|---|---|---|
| Mileage | 3.5 | 3.9 |
| Performance | 4.2 | 4.4 |
| Comfort | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Maintenance | 3.5 | 3.8 |
| Features | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
- Interact with community
- Become a Top Contributor
Add Car
Add Bike
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F and Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
-
Bajaj Pulsar 250F - September 2021 Update | Here’s What The Spy Shots Reveal | ZigWheels.com 13 Sep, 2021 14003 views
-
All you need to know : 2017 Bajaj Pulsar 220F : PowerDrift 16 Feb, 2017 869303 views
-
Bajaj Pulsar 220F (2017) : 0-60 0-100 : PowerDrift 11 Feb, 2017 161082 views
-
Bajaj Pulsar 220F (2017) : Exhaust Note : PowerDrift 11 Feb, 2017 98010 views
-
Hero Mavrick 440 vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z | India’s Most Affordable 400cc Bikes 8 Aug, 2024 9125 views
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z First Ride Review | Performance On An Extreme Budget 11 May, 2024 12705 views
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar 220 FRs. 1.41 LakhvsPulsar 220 F vs Avenger Cruise 220
BajajAvenger Cruise 220Rs. 1.45 Lakh -
BajajPulsar 220 FRs. 1.41 LakhvsPulsar 220 F vs Apache RTR 200 4V
TVSApache RTR 200 4VRs. 1.48 Lakh -
BajajPulsar 220 FRs. 1.41 LakhvsPulsar 220 F vs Classic 350
Royal EnfieldClassic 350Rs. 1.93 Lakh
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar NS400ZRs. 1.84 LakhvsPulsar NS400Z vs Apache RTR 310
TVSApache RTR 310Rs. 2.49 Lakh -
BajajPulsar NS400ZRs. 1.84 LakhvsPulsar NS400Z vs Hunter 350
Royal EnfieldHunter 350Rs. 1.49 Lakh -
BajajPulsar NS400ZRs. 1.84 LakhvsPulsar NS400Z vs Guerrilla 450
Royal EnfieldGuerrilla 450Rs. 2.39 Lakh -
BajajPulsar NS400ZRs. 1.84 LakhvsPulsar NS400Z vs 390 Adventure X
KTM390 Adventure XRs. 2.83 Lakh
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar 220 F and Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar 220F: Same Price Other Options20 Jun, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels -
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z: Top 5 Most Commonly Asked Questions12 May, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels -
Updated 2024 Bajaj Pulsar 220F Launched With New Graphics And A Fully Digital Console24 Apr, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels -
-
Iconic Indian Bikes That Made A Comeback: Bajaj Pulsar 220F, LML Star & More19 Mar, 2023 | By Team ZigWheels -
Bajaj Pulsar NS400 Could Get Another Variant6 May, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels -
Bajaj Bids Adieu To Pulsar 220F11 Nov, 2021 | By Team ZigWheels -
-
No, The Pulsar 220F Will Not Be Discontinued...29 Oct, 2021 | By Team ZigWheels -
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. I want to buy bike for daily use with low maintenance. I have two choices, Pulsar 220F or Hornet 2.0. Which is
better ?
- As per your requirements, we would suggest you to go with the Honda Hornet 2.0. With a frugal engine, agreeable ergos, light handling and a comfortable ride, the Hornet makes for a great city bike. If you’re currently riding a 125cc bike and looking for something with more performance to make your commute that much more interesting, but you don’t necessarily want something very sporty with ‘racing DNA’, the Hornet offers a sensible and easy motorcycling experience. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - 2021 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V vs Bajaj Pulsar NS200 BS6 vs Honda Hornet 2.0: Battle Of The 200cc Nakeds
Q. Which is the best between YZF R15 V3 and Pulsar 220F?
- Both bikes are good enough. The Bajaj Pulsar 220F, despite its age, still remains an aspirational motorcycle for Indian buyers given its performance and features. Though the motor isn’t the most refined one out there, it is comfortable for city commutes as well as capable enough for highway touring. On the other hand, the R15 V3 remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or track enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. You may compare both bikes accordingly. Do take a test ride for better clarity. Check out authorised dealership details.
Q. I am 5 ft 7 inch, is it comfortable for me?
- According to the saddle height of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F, it may be difficult to ride by a 5.7ft height person. Moreover, you can have a test ride of the bike for a better idea of comfort and ride quality by visiting the nearest dealer in your city. You can click on the following link and select your city accordingly for the dealership details.
- Yess
- Hmm
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z FAQs
Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance and maintenance in your bike. But Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is better on the grounds of comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z?
The Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z by Rs. 43,974.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z?
For the STD version, 220 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar 220 F produces 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 373.27 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS400Z produces 40 PS @ 8800 rpm of power and 35 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F has better performance.
Images of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F and Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
Which one do you like more?
Pulsar NS400Z
Pulsar 220 F
×
Recently Visited