Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Price starts at Rs. 1.38 Lakh which is Rs. 18,140 costlier than base model of TVS Apache RTR 160 priced at Rs. 1.20 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is 40 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 160 is 47 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is powered by 220 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 160 is powered by 159.7 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is available in 3 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 160 comes with 7 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar 220 F vs Apache RTR 160

Key Highlights Pulsar 220 F STDApache RTR 160 Black Edition
Engine Type Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm

Pulsar 220 F vs Apache RTR 160 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar 220 F STDTVS Apache RTR 160 Black Edition
Rating
539 reviews
1070 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.20 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Colors
TVS Apache RTR 160 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS ... Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,141 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 3,469 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,020 Pulsar 220 F Insurance Rs. 10,715 Apache RTR 160 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled
SI, 4 stroke, Air cooled, SOHC, Fuel Injection
Engine Displacement
220 cc
159.7 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Max Torque
18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm
13.85 Nm @ 7000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Digital Twin Spark
...
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
...

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Mileage (Overall)
40 kmpl
47 kmpl
Top Speed
135 kmph
107 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-90/90-17 Rear :-110/80-17
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
790 mm
Length*Width*Height
2035*750*1165 mm3
2085*730*1105 mm3
Wheelbase
1350 mm
1300 mm
Length
2035 mm
2085 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
180 mm
Height
1165 mm
1105 mm
Width
750 mm
730 mm
Fuel Capacity
15 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
137 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
795 mm
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
280 mm
270 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
130 mm

Additional Features
Mobile Notifications, DTE
(Maximum Speed - Urban/Rain Mode - 97 kmph), (Maximum Power - Urban/Rain Mode - 13.32 PS @ 8000 rpm), (Maximum Torque - Urban/Rain Mode - 12.7 Nm @ 6500 rpm), Position Lamp, Roto Petal Disc Brake, Brake Fluid - DOT 3/DOT 4, Glide Through Technology
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
Halogen
AHO, LED Headlamp with all time on LED Position Lamp
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 6AH
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

Frame
...
Double Cradle Synchro STIFF
ABS
...
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes, Commuter Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Analogue
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Analogue
Digital
Clock
...
Low Oil Indicator
Passenger Footrest
...
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
  • Touring-friendly dynamics
TVS Apache RTR 160
  • Great engine tractability due to TVS Glide Through Technology (GTT)
  • Top-end variant is feature rich
  • Sporty and muscular design
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
  • Still looks the same
  • has lost the value proposition
TVS Apache RTR 160
  • Front-end feels unsettled at higher speeds
  • Brakes could have been better
  • Top-end variant is very expensive

Is TVS Apache RTR 160 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F?

56% users have chosen TVS Apache RTR 160 over Bajaj Pulsar 220 F in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 9508 users have also rated TVS Apache RTR 160 and Bajaj Pulsar 220 F on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, comfort and features. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Apache RTR 160 Pulsar 220 F
Mileage 3.8 3.9
Performance 4.2 4.4
Comfort 4.0 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 3.8
Features 4.1 4.3
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 160 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I want to buy bike for daily use with low maintenance. I have two choices, Pulsar 220F or Hornet 2.0. Which is better ?
  • As per your requirements, we would suggest you to go with the Honda Hornet 2.0. With a frugal engine, agreeable ergos, light handling and a comfortable ride, the Hornet makes for a great city bike. If you’re currently riding a 125cc bike and looking for something with more performance to make your commute that much more interesting, but you don’t necessarily want something very sporty with ‘racing DNA’, the Hornet offers a sensible and easy motorcycling experience. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read More: - 2021 TVS Apache RTR 200 4V vs Bajaj Pulsar NS200 BS6 vs Honda Hornet 2.0: Battle Of The 200cc Nakeds
Q. Which one is better Apache 160 or apace 180?
  • TVS has dealt with the Apache RTR 160 performance issue and has now made the bike near-perfect, well, except of course those raised eye-brow-like DRLs, which we think are a polarizing aspect of the design. Factor in the kind of equipment and features on offer, and it becomes a no-brainer if you’ve got performance on your mind. On the other hand, TVS Apache RTR 180 is a fun-to-ride motorcycle with quick handling dynamics and a range of safety features. The razor-sharp handling makes it a hoot to ride and it is a value-for-money vehicle. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
  • Rtr180 2010 model
  • If i says if tvs motor up grade 180 with 4v and 6 speed manual then don't wast time and go for it bkz i am a owner of 180 from last 10 years but i still clock 141 kmh speed on it, in short its far better then 200 4v or 1604v in speed but as we know only speed is nothing a bike with new upgrades is better in all aspects
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better Ns160 or Apache 160 ?
  • While TVS has done well in reviving the Apache RTR 160 2V with a fuel-injected motor, it could have done better by offering it new bodywork and additional features, something it has done with the Apache RTR 160 4V. On the other hand, while the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 BS6 might not have many tangible features to justify the price hike due to BS6 norms, it more than makes up for it with raw performance. In fact, it is the most powerful motorcycle in its segment, making it ideal for enthusiasts who prioritize performance over anything else. Moreover, we'd suggest you to go for Bajaj NS 160 for its raw powerful engine and capable perimeter frame. For better understanding, we would suggest you to take a test ride and then take a final decision. You can find dealers here.

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Vs TVS Apache RTR 160 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and features in your bike. On the basis of maintenance user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
The TVS Apache RTR 160 is cheaper than Bajaj Pulsar 220 F by Rs. 18,140.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs TVS Apache RTR 160?
For the STD version, 220 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar 220 F produces 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Black Edition version, 159.7 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 160 produces 16.04 PS @ 8750 rpm of power and 13.85 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 160 and Bajaj Pulsar 220 F

×
Select Category