Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Price starts at Rs. 1.49 Lakh which is Rs. 9,449 costlier than base model of Honda Hornet 2.0 priced at Rs. 1.40 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Honda Hornet 2.0 is 55.77 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is 36.2 kmpl. In technical specifications, Honda Hornet 2.0 is powered by 184.4 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is powered by 349.34 cc engine. Honda Hornet 2.0 is available in 4 different colours while Royal Enfield Hunter 350 comes with 8 colours. The Comparison Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Hornet 2.0 vs Hunter 350

Key Highlights Hornet 2.0 STDHunter 350 Retro
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Hornet 2.0 vs Hunter 350 Key Highlights

Basic Info Honda Hornet 2.0 STDRoyal Enfield Hunter 350 Retro
Rating
164 reviews
752 reviews
Brand Name Honda Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.40 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type 4 Stroke, SI Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Max Power 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Honda Hornet 2.0 Colors
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Drum
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Spoke
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Analogue
EMI
Rs. 4,046 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,318 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,052 Hornet 2.0 Insurance Rs. 10,440 Hunter 350 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
4 Stroke, SI Engine
Single cylinder, 4 stroke, SOHC Engine
Engine Displacement
184.4 cc
349.34 cc
Max Power
17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Max Torque
15.9 Nm @ 6000 rpm
27 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
61 mm
75 mm
Stroke
63.096 mm
85.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
2
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
ECU controlled
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Drum

Quarter Mile
18.34
...
Braking (60-0 kmph)
17.04m
21.29m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
30.05m
36.71m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
50.62m
69.42m
Mileage (City)
57.35 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
55.77 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
...
36.2 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
12.91s
16.43s
Top Speed
...
114 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17 Rear :-140/70-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-120/80-17
Peak Power
17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm
20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tube
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Spoke
Optimum Tyre pressure (Rider)
...
29 psi

Seat height
...
790 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
179 kg
Length*Width*Height
2034*783*1064 mm3
2055*800*1055 mm3
Wheelbase
1355 mm
1370 mm
Length
2034 mm
2055 mm
Ground Clearance
167 mm
150 mm
Height
1064 mm
1055 mm
Width
783 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
13 Liters
Kerb Weight
142 Kg
177 Kg
Total Weight
...
360 kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
...
790 mm
Front Brake Diameter
276 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
153 mm

Additional Features
Seat Length - 590 mm, Gear Position Indicator, Hazard Switch
...
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
Halogen
Battery Capacity
12V / 5AH
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb

Frame
Diamond Type
Twin Downtube Spine Frame
ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cruiser Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Single
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Analogue
Tachometer
...
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
...
Air & Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Service Due Indicator

Standard Warranty (Years)
3
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • Ideal for individuals seeking a Royal Enfield motorcycle that is lightweight and nimble
  • offering easy accessibility.
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
  • The relaxed nature of the engine doesn't complement with the motorcycle's contemporary chassis very well and the absence of features deprives the bike of any sense of modernity.

Is Honda Hornet 2.0 Better Than Royal Enfield Hunter 350?

51% users have chosen Honda Hornet 2.0 over Royal Enfield Hunter 350 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1698 users have also rated Honda Hornet 2.0 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Honda Hornet 2.0 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Hornet 2.0 Hunter 350
Mileage 4.0 3.9
Performance 4.3 4.4
Comfort 4.1 4.5
Maintenance 4.0 3.8
Features 4.4 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Honda Hornet 2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Hunter 350 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Honda Hornet 2.0 and Royal Enfield Hunter 350

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which bike to buy under 2 lakh from these bike Honda Hornet 2.0, Yamaha FZ 25 and Honda CB300F?
  • L;K ;LSK A;LSK ;L S;DLKA S;DKA SL;DKASL;D AS
  • Zdfkjj jsdklaj sdlkas jdlka jdklas jdklasj dklasj dlkas jdkla dklas jd
  • All three bikes are good in their own forte. Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likeable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. On the other hand, the Yamaha FZ 25 is powered by a 249 cc engine. This FZ 25 engine generates a power of 20.8 PS @ 8000 rpm and a torque of 20.1 Nm @ 6000 rpm. The new motorcycle gets an LED headlamp and tail lamp. The bike’s negative LCD display shows the real-time mileage apart from the regular trove of information. Another new feature in the BS6 model is the side-stand engine cutoff function. The FZ25 BS6’s premium variant, the FZS 25, gets knuckle guards, a longer windscreen, alloy wheels in the gold finish, and more premium colour options. And Honda CB300F is an amazing bike, it looks muscular and it offers a powerful which is good for long riders. The 2023 Honda CB300F gets a 293cc air-oil-cooled, single-cylinder engine producing 24.47PS at 7,500rpm and 25.6Nm at 5,500rpm. The updated model’s engine is now BS6.2 and OBD-2 compliant. It comes mated to a 6-speed gearbox with a slip-and-assist clutch. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 and Hunter 350 which is better to buy?
  • HUNTER 350
Q. Which is the best choice: Hunter 350 or Honda Hornet 2.0?
  • Both bikes are good in their own forte. The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is aimed at attracting new and younger riders to the brand. And thanks to its styling, compact proportions, and friendly nature, it does that pretty well. Royal Enfield has nailed the pricing of this retro roadster, making it more affordable than some premium small-capacity motorcycles. Considering the pricing and the product, Royal Enfield clearly has a winner in its hands. On the other hand, Honda Hornet 2.0 is a very likable motorcycle with great handling dynamics and a frugal engine. The presence of bits such as the USD fork and LED lighting gives it that premium feel but the lack of engine excitement does put a damper on spirits. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city and brand accordingly for details.
|Honda Hornet 2.0 Community

Honda Hornet 2.0 Vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350 FAQs

Which bike is best between Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
As per the users experiences Honda Hornet 2.0 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and maintenance in your bike. But Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is better on the grounds of performance, comfort and features.
Which bike is cheaper Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
The Honda Hornet 2.0 is cheaper than Royal Enfield Hunter 350 by Rs. 9,449.
Which bike offers better performance Honda Hornet 2.0 vs Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
For the STD version, 184.4 cc Petrol engine of Hornet 2.0 produces 17.26 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 15.9 Nm @ 6000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Retro version, 349.34 cc Petrol engine of Hunter 350 produces 20.4 PS @ 6100 rpm of power and 27 Nm @ 4000 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Honda Hornet 2.0 has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Honda Hornet 2.0

Which one do you like more?
Hornet 2.0
Hornet 2.0
Hunter 350
Hunter 350
×
Select Category
✖
✖