Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Price starts at Rs. 1.92 Lakh which is Rs. 33,124 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 priced at Rs. 1.58 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 38 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is powered by 199.5 cc engine , while Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is available in 4 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 comes with 3 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS200 vs Gixxer SF 250

Key Highlights Pulsar NS200 STDGixxer SF 250 Standard Edition
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm

Pulsar NS200 vs Gixxer SF 250 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS200 STDSuzuki Gixxer SF 250 Standard Edition
Rating
1013 reviews
127 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Suzuki
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.58 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.92 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled
Max Power 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Colors
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 4,752 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 5,534 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 12,311 Pulsar NS200 Insurance Rs. 11,920 Gixxer SF 250 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, Triple Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i
4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled
Engine Displacement
199.5 cc
249 cc
Max Power
24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
Max Torque
18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm
22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
76 mm
Stroke
...
54.9 mm
No Of Cylinders
...
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (Overall)
40.36 kmpl
38 kmpl

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17, Rear :-130/70-17
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
...
800 mm
Length*Width*Height
2017*804*1075 mm3
2010*740*1035 mm3
Wheelbase
1363 mm
1345 mm
Length
2017 mm
2010 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
165 mm
Height
1075 mm
1035 mm
Width
804 mm
740 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
12 Liters
Kerb Weight
158 Kg
161 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
...

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Additional Features
Gear Position Indicator
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
...
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Oil Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Sporty handling characteristics
  • the 6-speed gearbox proves advantageous on the highway
  • and commendable performance considering the price point
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
  • Free revving and torquey motor
  • Riding posture is sporty but not aggressive
  • Competent riding setup
Bajaj Pulsar NS200
  • Design looks dated now
  • lacks adequate features and the absence of dual-channel ABS is a miss
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
  • ABS calibration could have been better
  • Windshield seems inadequate for wind deflection
  • Touring capabilities could be restricted due to small tank

Is Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Better Than Bajaj Pulsar NS200?

53% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 over Bajaj Pulsar NS200 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 4478 users have also rated Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and Bajaj Pulsar NS200 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 has out rated Bajaj Pulsar NS200 on all the rating factors.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Gixxer SF 250 Pulsar NS200
Mileage 4.2 3.8
Performance 4.7 4.6
Comfort 4.7 4.3
Maintenance 4.3 4.0
Features 4.6 4.5
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Which one is the best NS200 or NS250?
  • The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 was always seen as an affordable alternative if you were in the market for a sporty streetfighter. As for the comfort, right from the moment you sit on it and reach for the bars, you get a lovely sense of command over the motorcycle. The seat cushioning is firm but absorbent, the texture is grippy and the slim tank allows you to straddle the bike more efficiently. Even the taut suspension isn’t that much of a bother. On the other hand, the Bajaj NS250 has not launched yet and it would be unfair to give a verdict. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your city accordingly for dealership details.
Q. Should I buy this bike now wait for the update to get launch?
  • If you want a bike now then you go for a current model. The NS 200 has gained in performance, despite the strict BS6 emissions. On the other hand, there is no official update of the launch of the new updated Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details. Read more -BS6 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Reviewed In Detailed Photos.
Q. Why Givver 250 cc is bettter the Gixxer sf ?
  • Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, etc. With its premium quality and fit and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by a 155 cc engine. This Gixxer SF engine generates a power of 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm and a torque of 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm. On the other hand, while the Gixxer SF 250 offers a sporty riding experience making it a great option for more mature riders. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by a 249 cc engine. This Gixxer SF 250 engine generates a power of 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm and a torque of 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.

Bajaj Pulsar NS200 Vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250?
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 has out rated Bajaj Pulsar NS200 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 is cheaper than Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 by Rs. 33,124.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS200 vs Suzuki Gixxer SF 250?
For the STD version, 199.5 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS200 produces 24.5 PS @ 9750 rpm of power and 18.74 Nm @ 8000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Standard Edition version, 249 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF 250 produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 has better performance.

Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS200 and Suzuki Gixxer SF 250

×
Recently Visited
Select Category