Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs TVS Apache RTR 310

TVS Apache RTR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.49 Lakh which is Rs. 64,990 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z priced at Rs. 1.85 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is 34 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 310 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is powered by 373.27 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 310 is powered by 312.12 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is available in 4 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 310 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs TVS Apache RTR 310 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Pulsar NS400Z vs Apache RTR 310

Key Highlights Pulsar NS400Z STDApache RTR 310 Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC with DLC coated finger followers Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Max Power 40 PS @ 8800 rpm 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm

Pulsar NS400Z vs Apache RTR 310 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z STDTVS Apache RTR 310 Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter
Rating
49 reviews
95 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.85 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 2.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC with DLC coated finger followers Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Max Power 40 PS @ 8800 rpm 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Colors
TVS Apache RTR 310 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,529 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 6,845 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 20,741 Pulsar NS400Z Insurance Rs. 12,894 Apache RTR 310 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Liquid Cooled, 4V, DOHC with DLC coated finger followers
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Engine Displacement
373.27 cc
312.12 cc
Max Power
40 PS @ 8800 rpm
35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Max Torque
35 Nm @ 6500 rpm
28.7 Nm @ 6650 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
80 mm
Stroke
...
62.1 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system
Compression Ratio
...
12.17 ± 0.35:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (Overall)
34 kmpl
35 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
7.19s
Top Speed
...
150 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-140/70-R17
Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17
Peak Power
40 PS @ 8800 rpm
35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
807 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
130 kg
Length*Width*Height
...
1991*831*1154 mm3
Wheelbase
1344 mm
1358 mm
Length
...
1991 mm
Ground Clearance
168 mm
180 mm
Height
...
1154 mm
Width
...
831 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
11 Liters
Kerb Weight
174 Kg
169 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
807 mm
800 mm
Front Brake Diameter
320 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
240 mm

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Additional Features
Throttle Control
Electronic throttle control, Glide Through Technology, Voice Assist, Telephony, Digi Docs, Crash Alert, GoPro Control, Smart Helmet Connectivity, Race Telemetry, Idle speed - 1600 ± 200rpm, Air filter - Dry Paper Type, Brake Fluid - DOT 4
Call/SMS Alerts
USB charging port
Music control
Headlight
LED
Dynamic Class D LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 8AH
Pilot Lamps
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Cruise Control
...
Frame
...
Hybrid with Trellis and cast frames, split chassis
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
5 inch TFT with Instrument cluster
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Handle Type
Hydroformed tubular Street fighter handlebar
...
Mobile Application
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Digital
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
Switchable ABS
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
  • Value-for-money
  • Powerful motor offers thrilling performance
  • Strong brakes
  • Wide
  • upright handlebar and comfortable seat
TVS Apache RTR 310
  • Plenty of performance - Motor is more powerful than the RR310
  • Packing some segment- and world-first features
  • Comfortable riding posture
  • Light and responsive handling
Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z
  • Engine does not feel as refined as the N series Pulsars
  • Suspension setup is on the stiffer side
  • Misses out on a radial tyre at the front
TVS Apache RTR 310
  • Shorter overall gearing means motor feels busy in lower gears
  • Vibrations get annoying beyond 100kmph
  • Even in Urban mode the throttle response is too aggressive
  • Quite pricey once you add all the BTO kits

Is Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Better Than TVS Apache RTR 310?

59% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z over TVS Apache RTR 310 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 215 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z and TVS Apache RTR 310 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 310 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, maintenance and features.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Pulsar NS400Z Apache RTR 310
Mileage 3.4 4.0
Performance 4.2 4.3
Comfort 4.6 4.5
Maintenance 3.5 3.9
Features 4.6 4.7
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 310 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z Vs TVS Apache RTR 310 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for comfort in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 310 is better on the grounds of mileage, performance, maintenance and features.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z is cheaper than TVS Apache RTR 310 by Rs. 64,990.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
For the STD version, 373.27 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS400Z produces 40 PS @ 8800 rpm of power and 35 Nm @ 6500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter version, 312.12 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 310 produces 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm of power and 28.7 Nm @ 6650 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 310 and Bajaj Pulsar NS400Z

×
Select Category