BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390

KTM RC 390 Price starts at Rs. 3.21 Lakh which is Rs. 16,173 costlier than base model of BMW G 310 RR priced at Rs. 3.05 Lakh. The claimed mileage of BMW G 310 RR is 30.3 kmpl whereas the mileage of KTM RC 390 is 25.89 kmpl. In technical specifications, BMW G 310 RR is powered by 312.12 cc engine , while KTM RC 390 is powered by 373 cc engine. BMW G 310 RR is available in 3 different colours while KTM RC 390 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

G 310 RR vs RC 390

Key Highlights G 310 RR STDRC 390 STD
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Max Power 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 43.5 PS
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390

G 310 RR vs RC 390 Key Highlights

Basic Info BMW G 310 RR STDKTM RC 390 STD
Rating
112 reviews
103 reviews
Brand Name BMW KTM
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 3.05 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 3.21 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Max Power 34 PS @ 9700 rpm 43.5 PS
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
BMW G 310 RR Colors
KTM RC 390 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 8,351 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 8,794 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 13,819 G 310 RR Insurance Rs. 22,878 RC 390 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
N/A

Engine Type
Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts and cam followers, wet sump lubrication
1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Displacement
312.12 cc
373 cc
Max Power
34 PS @ 9700 rpm
43.5 PS
Max Torque
27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm
37 Nm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
80 mm
89 mm
Stroke
62.1 mm
60 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
10.9 :1
14.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
17.13m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
30.81m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
48.22m
Mileage (City)
...
25.89 kmpl
Mileage (Overall)
30.3 kmpl
31.22 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
6.49s
Top Speed
160 kmph
169 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :- 150/60-17
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Peak Power
34 PS @ 9700 rpm
43.5 PS
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
811 mm
824 mm
Load carrying capacity
130 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2001*767*1135 mm3
2145*760*830 mm3
Wheelbase
1365 mm
1340 mm
Length
2001 mm
2145 mm
Ground Clearance
...
158 mm
Height
1135 mm
830 mm
Width
767 mm
760 mm
Fuel Capacity
11 Liters
13.7 Liters
Kerb Weight
174 Kg
172 Kg
Total Weight
304 kg
...
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
811 mm
824 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
240 mm
230 mm

Additional Features
Revolution Counter, On Board Computer
Cornering ABS, Quickshifter+
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
...
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED
Alternator
Three-Phase Alternator 308 W
...

Frame
Tubular space frame
Steel trellis frame, powder coated
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Average Fuel economy
...
Distance to Empty Indicator
...
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
Low Battery Indicator
...
Stepup Seat
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
LED Projector
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
KTM RC 390
  • Added engine versatility leads to more excitement; Sharp handling doesn’t scare you silly; Relatively relaxed ergos makes it more accommodating and lends better bike control; Cornering ABS
  • traction control and quickshifter!
KTM RC 390
  • Design is extremely polarising; Massive price hike compared to its predecessor; Fit and finish levels are sub-par.

Is BMW G 310 RR Better Than KTM RC 390?

65% users have chosen BMW G 310 RR over KTM RC 390 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 431 users have also rated BMW G 310 RR and KTM RC 390 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
BMW G 310 RR has out rated KTM RC 390 on all the rating factors.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor G 310 RR RC 390
Mileage 4.1 2.4
Performance 4.7 2.7
Comfort 4.5 3.4
Maintenance 3.9 2.3
Features 4.7 3.5
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

BMW G 310 RR Comparison with Similar Bikes

KTM RC 390 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on BMW G 310 RR and KTM RC 390

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Hi, I haven’t owned a bike yet but I am planning to but my first .. I am currently learning how to ride on the pulsar180 .. should I go for the rc 390 or apache 310 or any other one as I really love travelling .. but majorly I would ride in the city and occasionally hit the highway and might even go on long trips as I live in kashmir and the college that I have got in in New Delhi so it would be a bit your so pls suggest me a bike as I can’t reach on a decision .. I like Royal Enfield’s also but there power delivery is even less than the one I am currently owning .. my budget is around 3 lakhs .. pls suggest?
  • We would suggest you go for TVS Apache RR 310. TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you to take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership..Read more:- TVS Apache RR 310 BS6 Road Test Review
Q. Hi, I am looking to upgrade my Suzuki Hayate 110 cc. My Budget is around 3 Lakh, Should I Upgrade to Duke 390 or the Interceptor? or should I look for a lower capacity Motorcycle? My height is 5'5 and I weigh around 67 Kg. Please let me know the best bike for me as most of my rides will be in the city and occasional run on the highway.
  • You should take ktm RC 200 moto gp edition Or RC 390 moto gp edition
  • Yes go for it Duke 390
  • I suggest duke390 is better
View All Answers

BMW G 310 RR Vs KTM RC 390 FAQs

Which bike is best between BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390?
BMW G 310 RR has out rated KTM RC 390 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390?
The BMW G 310 RR is cheaper than KTM RC 390 by Rs. 16,173.
Which bike offers better performance BMW G 310 RR vs KTM RC 390?
For the STD version, 312.12 cc Petrol engine of G 310 RR produces 34 PS @ 9700 rpm of power and 27.3 Nm @ 7700 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 373 cc Petrol engine of RC 390 produces 43.5 PS of power and 37 Nm of torque
As per the users experiences the BMW G 310 RR has better performance.

Images of BMW G 310 RR and KTM RC 390

Which one do you like more?
G 310 RR
G 310 RR
RC 390
RC 390
×
Select Category
✖
✖