Explore all New Cars of 2024
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250
Suzuki Gixxer 250 Price starts at Rs. 1.81 Lakh which is Rs. 34,194 costlier than base model of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 priced at Rs. 1.47 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is 40.36 kmpl whereas the mileage of Suzuki Gixxer 250 is 38 kmpl. In technical specifications, Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine , while Suzuki Gixxer 250 is powered by 249 cc engine. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is available in 4 different colours while Suzuki Gixxer 250 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.
Pulsar NS160 vs Gixxer 250
Key Highlights | Pulsar NS160 STD | Gixxer 250 Ride Connect Edition |
---|---|---|
Engine Type | Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled |
Max Power | 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm | 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm |
-
Rs. 1.47 Lakh EMI - Rs. 4,400 View November OffersRs. 1.98 Lakh EMI - Rs. 5,704 View November Offers
Pulsar NS160 vs Gixxer 250 Key Highlights
Basic Info | Bajaj Pulsar NS160 STD | Suzuki Gixxer 250 Ride Connect Edition |
---|---|---|
Rating |
322 reviews
|
62 reviews
|
Brand Name | Bajaj | Suzuki |
Ex-Showroom Price | Rs. 1.47 Lakh Get On-Road Price | Rs. 1.98 Lakh Get On-Road Price |
Engine Type | Oil Cooled, Twin Spark, 4-Valve FI DTS-i | 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled |
Max Power | 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm | 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm |
Fuel Type | Petrol | Petrol |
Colors | ||
Brakes Front | Disc | Disc |
Brakes Rear | Disc | Disc |
Wheel Size | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm | Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm |
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) | Alloy | Alloy |
ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
Starting | Self Start Only | Self Start Only |
Speedometer | Digital | Digital |
EMI |
Rs. 4,400
@
11.99% (36 months)
|
Rs. 5,704
@
9.45% (36 months)
|
Insurance | Pulsar NS160 Insurance | Gixxer 250 Insurance |
Brochure |
Download
Brochure
|
Download
Brochure
|
Engine |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brakes |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tyres |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dimensions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Electricals |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Features |
|
Pros and Cons
- Positives
- Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
- It packs a pretty powerful engine
- Shares the capable perimeter frame with larger Pulsars
- Stopping power is pretty good.
Suzuki Gixxer 250
- Comfortable in the city and on the highway
- Big bike looks
- Decent amount of features
Bajaj Pulsar NS160
- Engine refinement could have been better
- It isn’t feature-rich like its segment rivals
- It is the heaviest 160cc motorcycle.
Suzuki Gixxer 250
- Brakes could be better
- Headlight intensity is a little below average
Is Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Better Than Suzuki Gixxer 250?
100% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar NS160 over Suzuki Gixxer 250 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1511 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Suzuki Gixxer 250 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Suzuki Gixxer 250 has out rated Bajaj Pulsar NS160 on all the rating factors.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..
Ratings Factor | Gixxer 250 | Pulsar NS160 |
---|---|---|
Mileage | 3.8 | 4.3 |
Performance | 4.4 | 4.7 |
Comfort | 4.2 | 4.3 |
Maintenance | 3.9 | 4.1 |
Features | 4.4 | 4.6 |
Videos of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Suzuki Gixxer 250
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Comparison with Similar Bikes
-
BajajPulsar NS160Rs. 1.47 LakhvsTVSApache RTR 160 4VRs. 1.24 Lakh
Suzuki Gixxer 250 Comparison with Similar Bikes
Latest News on Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Suzuki Gixxer 250
-
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Flex Fuel Showcased At IBET (India Bio-Energy And Tech) Expo 20244 Sep, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Quarter-Litre Suzuki Gixxer Twins Recalled. Here’s Why30 Apr, 2021 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Working On Twin-cylinder Gixxer 25014 Dec, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS160 And Pulsar NS200 Launched27 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
The Suzuki 250s Just Became More Expensive8 Jul, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
2024 Bajaj Pulsar NS200 And Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Unveiled Ahead Of Launch: Now More Feature-packed19 Feb, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Here Are The Two-wheelers That Were Launched This Past Month31 May, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Updated Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Spotted Testing19 Jan, 2024 | By Team ZigWheels
-
Suzuki Gixxer 250s Complete Company’s BS6 Portfolio29 May, 2020 | By Team ZigWheels
Recently Asked User Questions
Q. Which bike is best Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or Bajaj Pulsar NS 125?
- Bajaj Pulsar NS125 packs a peppy engine, is fun to ride, and could be the perfect beginner bike. The entry-level NS125 could be the perfect platform for those graduating from a scooter, and yearning to learn the ropes. The money you save could be a deposit for your next bike. On the other hand, Bajaj has done well to endow the NS160 with high-spec cycle parts and features while keeping the price in check. the Pulsar NS160 ticks all the right boxes when it comes to style, performance, ride and handling. Given Bajaj's extensive service network and low service costs, peace of mind is ensured. The new NS160 is a worthy contender and makes a strong case for itself in this highly competitive 160cc segment. Moreover, we would suggest you take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which is better between Yamaha FZ S version 3 (bs6) and Pulsar NS 160 (bs6). Kindly help me I considered many
in this 150/160 cc segment came to an conclusion between these two.
- Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, brand preference, etc. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 offers a Big bike styling, with good features and a smooth engine. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is powered by a 149 cc engine. This FZS-FI V3 engine generates a power of 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm and a torque of 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm. On the other hand, the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 BS6 might not have many tangible features to justify the price hike due to BS6 norms, it more than makes up for it with raw performance. In fact, it is the most powerful motorcycle in its segment, making it ideal for enthusiasts who prioritize performance over anything else. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine.This Pulsar NS160 engine generates a power of 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm and a torque of 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. I'm confused between bajaj NS 160 and TVS Apache 160 4V. Daily ride 60-80 km city and highway, which one is
better, please suggest.
- Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, brand preference, etc. While the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 BS6 might not have many tangible features to justify the price hike due to BS6 norms, it more than makes up for it with raw performance. In fact, it is the most powerful motorcycle in its segment, making it ideal for enthusiasts who prioritize performance over anything else. Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is powered by 160.3 cc engine.This Pulsar NS160 engine generates a power of 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm and a torque of 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm. On the other hand, The TVS Apache RTR 160 4V has been the benchmark when it comes to 160cc motorcycles. With the BS6-compliant iteration, TVS has made sure it is still as sprightly, with the '21 update making it the most powerful bike in the 160cc sporty commuter class. The overall package and reasonable pricing make it a true value for money motorcycle in its segment. TVS Apache RTR 160 4V is powered by a 159.7 cc engine. This Apache 160 4V engine generates a power of 17.63 PS @ 9250 rpm and a torque of 14.73 Nm @ 7250 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Bajaj Pulsar NS160 Vs Suzuki Gixxer 250 FAQs
Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250?
Suzuki Gixxer 250 has out rated Bajaj Pulsar NS160 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250?
The Bajaj Pulsar NS160 is cheaper than Suzuki Gixxer 250 by Rs. 50,795.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar NS160 vs Suzuki Gixxer 250?
For the STD version, 160.3 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar NS160 produces 17.2 PS @ 9000 rpm of power and 14.6 Nm @ 7250 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Ride Connect Edition version, 249 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer 250 produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torqueAs per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar NS160 has better performance.
Images of Bajaj Pulsar NS160 and Suzuki Gixxer 250
Which one do you like more?
×
Recently Visited