Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Pulsar 220 F vs Continental GT 650 Key Highlights

Basic Info Bajaj Pulsar 220 F STDRoyal Enfield Continental GT 650 British Racing Green
Rating
539 reviews
444 reviews
Brand Name Bajaj Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.38 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 3.19 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Max Power 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS ... Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital ...
EMI
Rs. 4,141 @ 11.99% (36 months)
Rs. 8,734 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,020 Pulsar 220 F Insurance Rs. 23,800 Continental GT 650 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Twin Spark DTS-i FI Engine, Oil Cooled
Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Engine Displacement
220 cc
647.95 cc
Max Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
...
78 mm
Stroke
...
67.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
Digital Twin Spark
Digital spark ignition
Compression Ratio
9.5:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (Overall)
40 kmpl
27 kmpl
Top Speed
135 kmph
170 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-90/90-17, Rear :-120/80-17
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-R18
Peak Power
20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm, Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
795 mm
804 mm
Length*Width*Height
2035*750*1165 mm3
2119*780*1067 mm3
Wheelbase
1350 mm
1398 mm
Length
2035 mm
2119 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
174 mm
Height
1165 mm
1067 mm
Width
750 mm
780 mm
Fuel Capacity
15 Liters
12.5 Liters
Kerb Weight
160 Kg
214 Kg
Total Weight
...
400 kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Saddle Height
795 mm
804 mm
Front Brake Diameter
280 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
230 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
Mobile Notifications, DTE
Paper element, Forced lubrication, Wet sump with pump driven oil delivery
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
Headlight
Halogen
LED
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
Bulb

Frame
...
Steel tubular, double cradle frame
ABS
...
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Cafe Racer Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Analogue and Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
Bluetooth
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
...
Speedometer
Digital
...
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
Analogue
...
Tripmeter
Digital
...
Gradeability
...
24 degrees
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
Analogue
...
Clock
...
Low Oil Indicator
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
...
Navigation
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
  • Touring-friendly dynamics
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
Bajaj Pulsar 220 F
  • Still looks the same
  • has lost the value proposition
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customisation options are limited

Is Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Better Than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?

77% users have chosen Bajaj Pulsar 220 F over Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 4507 users have also rated Bajaj Pulsar 220 F and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of performance, maintenance and features. On the basis of comfort user have rated both the bikes equally.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Continental GT 650 Pulsar 220 F
Mileage 3.9 3.8
Performance 4.4 4.8
Comfort 4.3 4.3
Maintenance 3.8 3.9
Features 4.3 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I am 5 ft 7 inch, is it comfortable for me?
  • According to the saddle height of Bajaj Pulsar 220 F, it may be difficult to ride by a 5.7ft height person. Moreover, you can have a test ride of the bike for a better idea of comfort and ride quality by visiting the nearest dealer in your city. You can click on the following link and select your city accordingly for the dealership details.
  • Yess
  • Hmm
View All Answers
Q. Which bike is better, TVS Apache RR 310 or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and TVS Apache RR 310 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. Which one is better Himalayan or GT 650
  • Both Royal Enfield Himalayan and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 are brilliant options, however, selecting one would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, usage of the bike, features requirement, etc. The Himalayan BS6 is a well-rounded package which is now just that little bit better than before. The Himalayan certainly isn’t flawless or entirely satisfactory in any singular aspect, but it makes up for these gaps by painting a picture of opportunity, inciting you to travel and explore on a whim. On the other hand, the GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.

Bajaj Pulsar 220 F Vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 FAQs

Which bike is best between Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
As per the users experiences Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of performance, maintenance and features. On the basis of comfort user have rated both the bikes equally.
Which bike is cheaper Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
The Bajaj Pulsar 220 F is cheaper than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 by Rs. 1.80 Lakh.
Which bike offers better performance Bajaj Pulsar 220 F vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
For the STD version, 220 cc Petrol engine of Pulsar 220 F produces 20.4 PS @ 8500 rpm of power and 18.55 Nm @ 7000 rpm of torque. Whereas for the British Racing Green version, 647.95 cc Petrol engine of Continental GT 650 produces 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Bajaj Pulsar 220 F has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and Bajaj Pulsar 220 F

×
Select Category