BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Price starts at Rs. 3.19 Lakh which is Rs. 29,000 costlier than base model of BMW G 310 R priced at Rs. 2.90 Lakh. The claimed mileage of BMW G 310 R is 28.57 kmpl whereas the mileage of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is 27 kmpl. In technical specifications, BMW G 310 R is powered by 313 cc engine , while Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is powered by 647.95 cc engine. BMW G 310 R is available in 3 different colours while Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 comes with 6 colours. The Comparison BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

G 310 R vs Continental GT 650

Key Highlights G 310 R STDContinental GT 650 British Racing Green
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts, wet sump lubrication Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Max Power 34 PS @ 9500 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm

G 310 R vs Continental GT 650 Key Highlights

Basic Info BMW G 310 R STDRoyal Enfield Continental GT 650 British Racing Green
Rating
108 reviews
437 reviews
Brand Name BMW Royal Enfield
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 2.90 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 3.19 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts, wet sump lubrication Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Max Power 34 PS @ 9500 rpm 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
BMW G 310 R Colors
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital ...
EMI
Rs. 7,940 @ 6% (36 months)
Rs. 8,734 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 13,567 G 310 R Insurance Rs. 23,800 Continental GT 650 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Water-cooled, single-cylinder 4-stroke engine, four valves, two overhead camshafts, wet sump lubrication
Inline twin cylinder, 4 stroke / SOHC
Engine Displacement
313 cc
647.95 cc
Max Power
34 PS @ 9500 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Max Torque
28 Nm @ 7500 rpm
52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
80 mm
78 mm
Stroke
62.1 mm
67.8 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
2
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
4
...
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Digital spark ignition
Compression Ratio
10.9:1
9.5:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
16.57m
...
Braking (80-0 kmph)
29.43m
...
Braking (100-0 kmph)
44.69m
...
Mileage (City)
32.46 kmpl
...
Mileage (Highway)
28.57 kmpl
...
Mileage (Overall)
...
27 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
8.01s
...
Top Speed
143 kmph
...

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-R17, Rear :- 150/60-R17
Front :-100/90-18, Rear :-130/70-R18
Peak Power
34 PS @ 9500 rpm
47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-457.2 mm,Rear :-457.2 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
...
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
785 mm
...
Load carrying capacity
181 kg
...
Length*Width*Height
2005*849*1080 mm3
2119*780*1067 mm3
Wheelbase
1380 mm
1398 mm
Length
2005 mm
2119 mm
Ground Clearance
...
174 mm
Height
1080 mm
1067 mm
Width
849 mm
780 mm
Fuel Capacity
11 Liters
12.5 Liters
Kerb Weight
158.5 Kg
214 Kg
Total Weight
345 kg
400 kg
Tail Light
LED
Bulb
Saddle Height
785 mm
...
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
320 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
240 mm
240 mm

Additional Features
Ride By Wire Technology
Paper element, Forced lubrication, Wet sump with pump driven oil delivery
USB charging port
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Battery Capacity
12V / 8AH
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
Bulb
Alternator
Three-phase alternator with 308 W
...

Frame
Tubular space frame
Steel tubular, double cradle frame
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Cafe Racer Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
...
Speedometer
Digital
...
Tripmeter
Digital
...
Gradeability
...
24 degrees
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Techometer
Digital
...
Clock
...
Passenger Footrest
Projector Headlights
...
Cooling System
Liquid Cooled
Air Cooled
Odometer
Digital
...
DRLs
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
BMW G 310 R
  • Looks muscular and has attractive colour schemes. Sublime handling doesn’t come at the cost of harsh ride quality. Motor feels energetic but with less vibrations now.
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Classic retro styling appeals to many
  • Not-too-aggressive riding posture
  • Great handling & nice exhaust note
BMW G 310 R
  • The LCD console feels dated and out of place on such a premium bike. Limited dealership network. Service costs are still on the higher side.
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
  • Could have better brakes
  • Clutch is on slightly heavier side
  • Customisation options are limited

Is BMW G 310 R Better Than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?

66% users have chosen BMW G 310 R over Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 1316 users have also rated BMW G 310 R and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences BMW G 310 R is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and comfort in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of performance, maintenance and features.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Continental GT 650 G 310 R
Mileage 4.0 3.8
Performance 4.6 4.8
Comfort 4.5 4.3
Maintenance 3.6 3.9
Features 4.5 4.6
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

BMW G 310 R Comparison with Similar Bikes

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. I am looking to upgrade to from a duke 200 to a bike with more bhp and Cubic capacity that can handle triple digit speeds. I am 5'3 and D200 seat height was not a problem with boots. I have shortlisted G310R and GT650 based on seat height, linear power delivery, brand value and quality. Kindly advice with the options.
  • The KTM 200 Duke was a game changer for the performance motorcycle segment in India. When it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades. Moreover, selecting between the BMW G 310 R and Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 would depend on certain factors such as budget, preference of the segment, features required, touring capabilities and also, availability of service network. The Continental GT 650 is powered by a 648cc, air and oil-cooled, parallel-twin engine that generates peak power of 47.6PS at 7100rpm and 52Nm of torque at 5200rpm mated to a 6-speed transmission assisted by a slip-and-assist clutch. It makes for a great step up for existing riders while offering new levels of refinement and performance. On the other hand, G310R sports a 313cc single-cylinder liquid cooled unit that produces 34PS at 9500rpm and 28Nm of torque at 7500rpm. The G 310 R is a bike that’s absolutely a hoot to ride thanks to its great handling dynamics, decently punchy motor and incredible ride quality. However, there are some drawbacks too such as vibrations and a cramped lower body posture which prevents you to spend longer hours on the saddle. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of comfort and compatibility. You may click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details. Read More: - BMW G 310 R: Road Test Review - The Greener Baby Beemers Burst Onto The Scene - Here’s How Much Power The Royal Enfield 650 Twins Make Now That They’re BS6-compliant
Q. Confused between G 310 R or Street 750?
  • It would be unfair to give a verdict as Harley Davidson Street 750 has been discontinued and is not available for sale now. On the other hand, BMW G 310 R is a great pick. BMW G 310 R is a sportbike with a 313cc motor, it has got excellent brakes, offers good bite, feedback and progression. Features packed bikes are pretty much the norm these days. In BMW G 310 R, you have LED lights all around, Additional comforts include an adjustable clutch and brake levers which will help you fine-tune the lever reach as per your hand size. The handling capabilities of the BMW G 310 R far outweigh the grip of its Michelin Pilot Street tyres. As far as touring is concerned, this bike can sit comfortably at highway speeds of around 100kmph, but anything beyond that begins to feel harsh. So yes, you can use it for long-distance touring. And if you happen to find some poor or broken roads on this tour, the BMW’s excellent ride quality will do a fine job of soaking most of it up. But if pukka off-roading is what you have in mind, considering this bike could be among not so good decisions. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is better, TVS Apache RR 310 or Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
  • Selecting between the Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and TVS Apache RR 310 would depend on certain factors such as your budget, preference of the segment, performance figures, features required, etc. The Continental GT 650 is a fun to ride cafe racer. The GT’s sporty riding position makes it much more suitable for twisty mountain roads and even high-speed straight-line blasts. To top things off, the twin-cylinder motor provides the performance and refinement that the 535 simply couldn’t. On the other hand, TVS has done an incredible job in ironing out the sore spots of the Apache RR 310 with the BS6 update. It is loaded with tech, making it the most technologically advanced motorcycle in its class. The new prices are quite close to its fiercest rival -- the KTM RC 390. While it may lack the outright performance of the RC 390, the Apache RR 310 BS6 makes up for it by being a well-rounded machine that can do daily duties as well as corner carving or even touring, for that matter. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.

BMW G 310 R Vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 FAQs

Which bike is best between BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
As per the users experiences BMW G 310 R is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage and comfort in your bike. But Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is better on the grounds of performance, maintenance and features.
Which bike is cheaper BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
The BMW G 310 R is cheaper than Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 by Rs. 29,000.
Which bike offers better performance BMW G 310 R vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650?
For the STD version, 313 cc Petrol engine of G 310 R produces 34 PS @ 9500 rpm of power and 28 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the British Racing Green version, 647.95 cc Petrol engine of Continental GT 650 produces 47.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 52.3 Nm @ 5150 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the BMW G 310 R has better performance.

Images of Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 and BMW G 310 R

×
Select Category