Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310

TVS Apache RTR 310 Price starts at Rs. 2.49 Lakh which is Rs. 57,890 costlier than base model of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 priced at Rs. 1.92 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is 38 kmpl whereas the mileage of TVS Apache RTR 310 is 35 kmpl. In technical specifications, Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by 249 cc engine , while TVS Apache RTR 310 is powered by 312.12 cc engine. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is available in 3 different colours while TVS Apache RTR 310 comes with 2 colours. The Comparison Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

Gixxer SF 250 vs Apache RTR 310

Key Highlights Gixxer SF 250 Standard EditionApache RTR 310 Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter
Engine Type 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Max Power 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
  1. Home ›
  2. New Bikes ›
  3. Compare Bikes ›
  4. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310

Gixxer SF 250 vs Apache RTR 310 Key Highlights

Basic Info Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Standard EditionTVS Apache RTR 310 Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter
Rating
126 reviews
95 reviews
Brand Name Suzuki TVS
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.92 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 2.49 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type 4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Max Power 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Colors
TVS Apache RTR 310 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Dual Channel Dual Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 5,534 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 6,845 @ 6% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 11,920 Gixxer SF 250 Insurance Rs. 12,894 Apache RTR 310 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
4-Cycle, 1-cylinder, Oil cooled
Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Liquid Cooled, Fuel Injected, Spark Ignited Engine
Engine Displacement
249 cc
312.12 cc
Max Power
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Max Torque
22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm
28.7 Nm @ 6650 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
76 mm
80 mm
Stroke
54.9 mm
62.1 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
...
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Ignition
...
Dynamically controlled integrated high energy ignition system
Compression Ratio
...
12.17 ± 0.35:1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Mileage (Overall)
38 kmpl
35 kmpl
0-100 Kmph (sec)
...
7.19s
Top Speed
...
150 kmph

Tyre Size
Front :-110/70-17, Rear :-150/60-17
Front :-110/70-R17 Rear :-150/60-R17
Peak Power
26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm
35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
800 mm
800 mm
Load carrying capacity
...
130 kg
Length*Width*Height
2010*740*1035 mm3
1991*831*1154 mm3
Wheelbase
1345 mm
1358 mm
Length
2010 mm
1991 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
180 mm
Height
1035 mm
1154 mm
Width
740 mm
831 mm
Fuel Capacity
12 Liters
11 Liters
Kerb Weight
161 Kg
169 Kg
Tail Light
LED
LED
Saddle Height
800 mm
800 mm
Front Brake Diameter
300 mm
300 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
...
240 mm

Battery Type
...
Lead Acid
Additional Features
...
Electronic throttle control, Glide Through Technology, Voice Assist, Telephony, Digi Docs, Crash Alert, GoPro Control, Smart Helmet Connectivity, Race Telemetry, Idle speed - 1600 ± 200rpm, Air filter - Dry Paper Type, Brake Fluid - DOT 4
Call/SMS Alerts
...
USB charging port
...
Music control
...
Headlight
LED
Dynamic Class D LED
Battery Capacity
...
12V / 8AH
Pilot Lamps
...
Turn Signal Lamp
LED
LED

Cruise Control
...
Frame
...
Hybrid with Trellis and cast frames, split chassis
ABS
Dual Channel
Dual Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Naked Bikes, Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
...
Instrument Console
Digital
Digital
Bluetooth Connectivity
...
Bluetooth
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Split
Split
Pass Switch
Display
5 inch TFT with Instrument cluster
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tripmeter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
Techometer
Digital
Digital
Clock
...
Digital
Stepup Seat
...
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Oil Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
Digital
Navigation
...
Switchable ABS
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
  • Free revving and torquey motor
  • Riding posture is sporty but not aggressive
  • Competent riding setup
TVS Apache RTR 310
  • Plenty of performance - Motor is more powerful than the RR310
  • Packing some segment- and world-first features
  • Comfortable riding posture
  • Light and responsive handling
Suzuki Gixxer SF 250
  • ABS calibration could have been better
  • Windshield seems inadequate for wind deflection
  • Touring capabilities could be restricted due to small tank
TVS Apache RTR 310
  • Shorter overall gearing means motor feels busy in lower gears
  • Vibrations get annoying beyond 100kmph
  • Even in Urban mode the throttle response is too aggressive
  • Quite pricey once you add all the BTO kits

Is Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Better Than TVS Apache RTR 310?

50% users have chosen Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 over TVS Apache RTR 310 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 420 users have also rated Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and TVS Apache RTR 310 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 310 is better on the grounds of features.
Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor Apache RTR 310 Gixxer SF 250
Mileage 4.2 4.0
Performance 4.7 4.3
Comfort 4.7 4.5
Maintenance 4.3 3.9
Features 4.6 4.7
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Comparison with Similar Bikes

TVS Apache RTR 310 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Latest News on Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 and TVS Apache RTR 310

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. Why Givver 250 cc is bettter the Gixxer sf ?
  • Selecting the right bike would depend on several factors such as your budget preference on the segment, features required, engine options, etc. With its premium quality and fit and finish, the Suzuki Gixxer is an undoubtedly impressive motorcycle. Suzuki Gixxer SF is powered by a 155 cc engine. This Gixxer SF engine generates a power of 13.6 PS @ 8000 rpm and a torque of 13.8 Nm @ 6000 rpm. On the other hand, while the Gixxer SF 250 offers a sporty riding experience making it a great option for more mature riders. Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is powered by a 249 cc engine. This Gixxer SF 250 engine generates a power of 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm and a torque of 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership.
Q. If there is race between sf250 and r15 V3 who will win the race
  • R15 V3 is a kid compared to SF 250. I remember beating all v3s till now on road n on highways. But sf 150 is a kid for v3 also in the same segment.
  • R15 v3 is a kid compared to sf 250. I remember beating all v3s till now on road n on highways. But sf 155 is a kid for v3 also
  • If you compare 155cc bike with an 250cc bike then obviously in a drag race 250cc bike wins, but in 150cc segment this is the best bike till now ( my opinion ) because I too own R15 v3
View All Answers
Q. Confused between, SF250, R15 V3 and NS200. My height is 6 feet.
  • Among the available options, we would suggest you to go with the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 if you are looking for a bike with sporty handling, a brilliant gearbox, and a good price to performance ratio. The Bajaj Pulsar NS200 was always seen as an affordable alternative if you were in the market for a sporty streetfighter. However, given that the competition now offers better features, the Bajaj Pulsar NS200 feels less relevant now. On the other hand, you may go for the Suzuki SF 250 for its all-rounder capabilities. It’s good in the city, works well on the highway, and although not extremely sporty, handles well too. Then it’s comfortable for the rider and not too bad for the pillion either. The build is solid, and its design, while not universally lovable, is certainly striking. For a better understanding of compatibility and riding comfort, we would suggest you to take a test ride. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
|Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Community

Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 Vs TVS Apache RTR 310 FAQs

Which bike is best between Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
As per the users experiences Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is a winner for you if you are seriously looking for mileage, performance, comfort and maintenance in your bike. But TVS Apache RTR 310 is better on the grounds of features.
Which bike is cheaper Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
The Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 is cheaper than TVS Apache RTR 310 by Rs. 57,890.
Which bike offers better performance Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 vs TVS Apache RTR 310?
For the Standard Edition version, 249 cc Petrol engine of Gixxer SF 250 produces 26.5 PS @ 9300 rpm of power and 22.2 Nm @ 7300 rpm of torque. Whereas for the Arsenal Black Without Quickshifter version, 312.12 cc Petrol engine of Apache RTR 310 produces 35.6 PS @ 9700 rpm of power and 28.7 Nm @ 6650 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Suzuki Gixxer SF 250 has better performance.

Images of TVS Apache RTR 310 and Suzuki Gixxer SF 250

Which one do you like more?
Apache RTR 310
Apache RTR 310
Gixxer SF 250
Gixxer SF 250
×
Select Category
✖
✖