Yamaha FZS-FI V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0

Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 Price starts at Rs. 1.68 Lakh which is Rs. 46,300 costlier than base model of Yamaha FZS-FI V3 priced at Rs. 1.21 Lakh. The claimed mileage of Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is 55.42 kmpl whereas the mileage of Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 is 47.94 kmpl. In technical specifications, Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is powered by 149 cc engine , while Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 is powered by 155 cc engine. Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is available in 3 different colours while Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 comes with 11 colours. The Comparison Yamaha FZS-FI V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 can be described on the basis of price and specifications.

FZS-FI V3 vs MT 15 V2.0

Key Highlights FZS-FI V3 Matte Red And Matte GreyMT 15 V2.0 STD
Engine Type Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm

FZS-FI V3 vs MT 15 V2.0 Key Highlights

Basic Info Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Matte Red And Matte GreyYamaha MT 15 V2.0 STD
Rating
529 reviews
1685 reviews
Brand Name Yamaha Yamaha
Ex-Showroom Price Rs. 1.21 Lakh Get On-Road Price Rs. 1.68 Lakh Get On-Road Price
Engine Type Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Max Power 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Colors
Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Colors
Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 Colors
Brakes Front Disc Disc
Brakes Rear Disc Disc
Wheel Size Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy) Alloy Alloy
ABS Single Channel Single Channel
Starting Self Start Only Self Start Only
Speedometer Digital Digital
EMI
Rs. 3,512 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Rs. 4,846 @ 9.45% (36 months)
Insurance Rs. 8,960 FZS-FI V3 Insurance Rs. 14,138 MT 15 V2.0 Insurance
Brochure
Download Brochure
Download Brochure

Engine Type
Air cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve
Liquid cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valve
Engine Displacement
149 cc
155 cc
Max Power
12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm
18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm
Max Torque
13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm
14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Emission Type
bs6-2.0
bs6-2.0
Bore
57.3 mm
58.0 mm
Stroke
57.9 mm
58.7 mm
No Of Cylinders
1
1
Drive Type
Chain Drive
Chain Drive
Valve Per Cylinder
2
4
Fuel Type
Petrol
Petrol
Compression Ratio
9.6 : 1
11.6 :1

Brakes Front
Disc
Disc
Brakes Rear
Disc
Disc

Braking (60-0 kmph)
...
19.79m
Braking (80-0 kmph)
...
35.05m
Braking (100-0 kmph)
...
58.20m
Mileage (City)
49.31 kmpl
56.87 kmpl
Mileage (Highway)
55.42 kmpl
47.94 kmpl

Tyre Size
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/60-17
Front :-100/80-17 Rear :-140/70R-17
Wheel Size
Front :-431.8 mm,Rear :-431.8 mm
Front :-431.8 mm Rear :-431.8 mm inch
Tyre Type
Tubeless
Tubeless
Radial Tyre
Wheels Type (Pressed Steel/ Alloy)
Alloy
Alloy

Seat height
790 mm
810 mm
Length*Width*Height
1990*780*1080 mm3
2015*800*1070 mm3
Wheelbase
1330 mm
1325 mm
Length
1990 mm
2015 mm
Ground Clearance
165 mm
170 mm
Height
1080 mm
1070 mm
Width
780 mm
800 mm
Fuel Capacity
13 Liters
10 Liters
Kerb Weight
135 Kg
141 Kg
Tail Light
Bulb
LED
Front Brake Diameter
282 mm
282 mm
Rear Brake Diameter
220 mm
220 mm

Additional Features
Muffler Cover, Tank Pad (Optional), Skid Plate (Optional), Rear Footrest (Optional), USB Charger (Optional), Seat Cover (Optional), Engine Guard (Optional),
Y-Connect, VVA, Gear Position Indicator, Fuel consumption indicator, Shift timing light, VVA indicator, Sidestand engine cut-off switch, Position Light - LED, Phone Battery Level Status, Maintenance Recommendations, Last Parking Location, Malfunction Notification, Revs Dashboard, Ranking, Aluminium Swingarm
Call/SMS alerts
...
Headlight
LED
LED
Charging at Home
...
Charging at Charging Station
...
Turn Signal Lamp
Bulb
LED

ABS
Single Channel
Single Channel
Body Type
Sports Bikes
Sports Bikes
Body Graphics
Optional
...
Starting
Self Start Only
Self Start Only
Seat Type
Single
Split
Pass Switch
...
Display
Speedometer
Digital
Digital
Mobile Application
...
Tachometer
...
Digital
Trip Meter
Digital
Digital
Low Fuel Warning Lamp
...
Clock
Digital
Digital
Passenger Footrest
Cooling System
Air Cooled
Liquid Cooled
Odometer
Digital
...

Pros and Cons

  • Positives
  • Negatives
Yamaha FZS-FI V3
  • Big bike styling
  • features
  • smooth engine.
Yamaha MT 15 V2.0
  • Engine is well refined
  • Very agile and nimble
  • Design is very eye catching
Yamaha FZS-FI V3
  • Performance isn’t up to the mark
  • the quality of plastics feels sub-par.
Yamaha MT 15 V2.0
  • Lacks bottom end grunt
  • Suspension is too stiff
  • Pillion seat is nonexistent

Is Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 Better Than Yamaha FZS-FI V3?

64% users have chosen Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 over Yamaha FZS-FI V3 in a survey being conducted on zigwheels.com.
Apart from this survey a total of 4306 users have also rated Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 and Yamaha FZS-FI V3 on some really important factors like Mileage , performance, comfort, safety etc. and have given their personal opinions about these bikes.
Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 has out rated Yamaha FZS-FI V3 on all the rating factors.

Before making your decision you should also consider the unbiased and thorough analysis of these bikes on every aspect by our auto experts who have summarised the analysis in pros, cons and final conclusion..

Ratings Factor MT 15 V2.0 FZS-FI V3
Mileage 4.6 4.2
Performance 4.7 4.2
Comfort 4.5 4.4
Maintenance 4.3 3.8
Features 4.7 4.3
Image
Do you own a Car or a Bike?
  • Interact with community
  • Become a Top Contributor
Add Car Add Bike

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 Comparison with Similar Bikes

Recently Asked User Questions

Q. What should I buy between Yamaha MT 15 V2 and R15S?
  • Yes
  • MT 15 V2 bike
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. On the other hand, the Yamaha R15S remains one potent small-capacity supersport for beginners. In its version 3.0 guise, it has become sharper and more focused, making it great for sport riding or trac enthusiasts. However, the aggressive riding stance could cause discomfort if you intend to use the bike for daily commuting and the quality of components have also gone down. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.
Q. Which bike is the best between, Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 or KTM 200 Duke?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. The design update has given the KTM 200 Duke a new lease of life. Also, the fact that the new BS6-compliant motor does not lose out on performance almost makes it feel like a win-win. That said, the substantial hike in price means it is now more expensive than larger motorcycles such as the Suzuki Gixxer 250. However, when it comes to thrills, the KTM 200 Duke delivers it in spades! On the other hand, The updates as expected have made the new MT-15 a better bike. It looks more premium, handles better and the addition of a few new features is welcome. But we were expecting more from Yamaha! The dullness of the engine is disappointing and the lack of dual-channel ABS is just beyond any reasoning with this performance on tap. As for goodies such as a quick-shifter and traction control, they should have been offered as part of a premium variant. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride before making the final decision. Follow the link and select your desired city for dealership details.Read more -Yamaha MT-15 Version 2.0 Road Test Review - The Perfect Imperfection.
Q. Confused between, FS-Z Fi V3 and MT-15?
  • Both the bikes are good in their forte. In nearly every aspect, except maybe ergonomics and braking, the Yamaha FZS-FI v3.0 fails to impress. While its motor offers better fuel efficiency compared to the previous-gen model, it lacks grunt. If you have around Rs 1 lakh to invest, you're better off with say a TVS Apache RTR 160 4V, Bajaj Pulsar NS 160 or the Suzuki Gixxer. Whereas, the Yamaha MT 15 BS6 is more than just the R15 v3 sans fairing. The naked looks sharp is light and can be a hoot to commute. However, the compact riding posture might be a bit too tight for large riders. What is also disheartening is the poor switchgear and build quality as well as the lack of dual-channel ABS. Moreover, we would suggest you to take a test ride for a better understanding of performance and comfort. Click on the link and select your desired city for dealership details.

Yamaha FZS-FI V3 Vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 FAQs

Which bike is best between Yamaha FZS-FI V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0?
Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 has out rated Yamaha FZS-FI V3 on all the rating factors.
Which bike is cheaper Yamaha FZS-FI V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0?
The Yamaha FZS-FI V3 is cheaper than Yamaha MT 15 V2.0 by Rs. 46,300.
Which bike offers better performance Yamaha FZS-FI V3 vs Yamaha MT 15 V2.0?
For the Matte Red And Matte Grey version, 149 cc Petrol engine of FZS-FI V3 produces 12.4 PS @ 7250 rpm of power and 13.3 Nm @ 5500 rpm of torque. Whereas for the STD version, 155 cc Petrol engine of MT 15 V2.0 produces 18.4 PS @ 10000 rpm of power and 14.1 Nm @ 7500 rpm of torque
As per the users experiences the Yamaha FZS-FI V3 has better performance.
×
Recently Visited
Select Category